Thread: looking back
View Single Post

Old 11-30-2006, 06:01 AM   #28 (permalink)
ingibbsitrust
FBF Coach
 
ingibbsitrust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,591
Credits: 525.50
ingibbsitrust is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(GoGiants98 @ Nov 29th ) [snapback]1801900[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
and the only reasonthe redskins catch so much heat is because they spent so much cash on guys that havent done jack ****...ive never heard someone say "The Redskins defense sucks this year because they went out and got a bunch of new guys"
[/b]
wow, guess you dont read the paper, internet, or this board much


the expression has been said about them on both sides all season... yet they only sign 2 on offense and 2 on defense... everyone said they signed the "big time big name FAs to big deals and had there anual roster overhaul".... they signed 2 role players on defense and 2 rplayers on offense (and ARE is punt ret too)
only

AA is the one I dont like (I COULD CARE THE **** LESS ABOUT THE MONEY ANY PLAYER MAKES - IT HAS NEVER, EVER KEPT THEM FROM SIGNING FAs, PERIOD, DESPITE 1,000,000,000 STORIES AND POSTS TO THE CONTRARY) Snyder has the Cash on Hand to pay the guaranteed money and chooses to do so... they have had as much as 20 million in "dead cap" and still signed FA they wanted, even made the PO last year with 16 million in dead cap.

Performance matters.... Gibbs wanted "role players" over the super star FA and thats why they signed the players they did.... has is worked out so far? No, but they are also young and have many more years ahead of them, which is also a change from the 2000 signings
__________________
ingibbsitrust is offline   Reply With Quote