JessJess6713

There is only on other team in the top 25 who's lost 2 games to unranked teams, and hasn't beaten a current top 25 team (that other team is Virginia).

I don't know how you justify putting a team who almost lost to UNLV and the citadel, who did lose to two different unranked opponents, and who has no notable wins in the top 25. At least this will be fixed after Ohio State and Michigan both have their way them.

They were the most over-rated team at the beginning of the season. It showed when they got knocked out of the rankings. Now, they've crawled back in after beating weak teams.

Penn State, who beat Wisconsin, isn't ranked. WTF? They lost the same number of games, but Penn State lost both to ranked opponents. How do you justify that ranking?

Like I said, it will be fixed over the next two weeks, but there is still a problem. The problem is recent losses play unreasonably more than losses from a few weeks ago. The voters have memories like massive headwound victims.

Playing the tough part of your schedule at the end of the year is the most dangerous thing you can do, and that's a fact. It's a fact that needs to change

wagon

Jess, your not in thread so I don't know who your talking to being that you just posted your first #1(pl) to ? Wisconsin is actually playing better, which is what they generally do every season...you say they don't belong and then you claim a tough schedule for the Penn St.??? Is that correct? I'm lost to your lead...who is the ghost your talking to?
As far as the scheduling, the school's AD generally does that anywhere from 3-5 years ahead of time...who would have known anything? In terms of the emediate year!

JessJess6713

First of all, just b/c I just starting using this site doesn't mean I don't know anything. I just posted something the was relevant to see how other people on this site thought about it.

Second, I never said that Penn State had a hard schedule. I only said that they beat Wisconsin and have only lost to ranked opponents. I didn't bash the strength of the Big Ten schedule b/c I was being respectful since I posted aa thread in the Big Ten area. I also never said that the schedules were determined at the beginning of the year, or suggested that coaches should avoid tough teams at the end of the year. I only said that it was dangerous b/c it's unfair. I suggested that the way it is viewed should change.

Finally, that little star running back nonsence under your name shouldn't go to your head. You responded to the post 20 minutes after I posted it, so some one (you) saw it. I guess I was talking to you, your majesty. I'm more interested in seeing what someone who wants to talk football has to say. I'm not so interested in your weak attempts to feed your own ego. Look through my posts for typo and mispelled words as if it somehow makes what I'm saying less valid, bash me for conclusions that you draw, and make fun of the number of posts that I've made if your ego needs it. I done with you and won't respond to you again. Your website rating means ****.

wagon

First of all, posting by accident to the primary #1 is okay by me...I was just after your thinking of making it harder on the latter of the schedules...my point was, there is no way of knowing who is goin to be the big dogs of Nov. 3-5 years ahead...??? I just didn't understand your thought and still don't! As far as Majesty well, thankyou but I'm just alittle short of that and someone put that RB gig on my user, honestly, I didn't...funny though! So, what is your complaint about again? Oh yeah the present schedule...? Well, you'll have to go to the board of regents and file a grievance about the AD and his scheduling, I guess? Chill man, no harm. Your acting like there is bullets flying around here to hit ya in the head or a** or something...easy my man! Thanks for the Chattanooga descrip., it was very nice! Go Penn St.???

wagon

You can put on some combat gear, if that will make you feel better?