 |
|
04-13-2006, 04:29 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
TGM Trillionaire
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philly boy in Cali
Posts: 33,859
|
Chicago Bears 2006 Schedule
Chicago Bears
Sept. 10 at Green Bay, 4:15 p.m. W 26-0
Sept. 17 Detroit, 1 p.m.
Sept. 24 at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Oct. 1 Seattle, 8:15 p.m.
Oct. 8 Buffalo, 1 p.m.
Oct. 16 at Arizona, 8:30 p.m.
Oct. 22 BYE
Oct. 29 San Francisco, 1 p.m.
Nov. 5 Miami, 1 p.m.
Nov. 12 at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
Nov. 19 at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
Nov. 26 at New England, 1 p.m.
Dec. 3 Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Dec. 11 at St. Louis, 8:30 p.m.
Dec. 17 Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Dec. 24 at Detroit, 1 p.m.
Dec. 31 Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Last edited by bigboy : 09-12-2006 at 08:54 PM.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
05-12-2006, 03:31 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
The Star Stills Shines
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Woodhaven, Michigan
Posts: 4,049
|
this team will win the NFC North once again..
|
|
|
05-13-2006, 10:54 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Powder puff all-star
Join Date: May 2006
Location: woodhaven michigan
Posts: 179
|
no u r wrong once agian the lions will over take the bears this year and win the nfc north...one word for u offense
|
|
|
05-14-2006, 01:31 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
WNFL Cheerleader
Join Date: May 2006
Location: woodhaven michigan
Posts: 277
|
they added brian griese big deal they still have a bad offense this is the vikings and lions division
|
|
|
05-15-2006, 12:37 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
TGM Trillionaire
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philly boy in Cali
Posts: 33,859
|
let's see what the lions can do before declaring one of the losingest teams in recent memory in the race for the division. Bear's are the champs until I see anything that could unseat them.
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 11:11 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Looking to be drafted
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Outside Chicago
Posts: 4
|
The bears will win it because nobody else will win it. The Vikings are absolutely horrible, the Packers have nothing except a QB who will throw 30+ ints and no go to WRS or RBs, and the Lions are and always will be underachievers.
__________________
Ditka is God
|
|
|
05-18-2006, 01:12 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Slightly north of Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,819
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lionsfan06
no u r wrong once agian the lions will over take the bears this year and win the nfc north...one word for u offense
|
Offense doesn't win games like defense does.. That aside, what offense are you referring to? An inconsistent QB best used as a backup, an underachieving RB, an OL that can't block 1 guy (much less 8), three first round bust WR's, and a TE... hey, who is your TE these days? I haven't heard of anyone..  Anyway, if THAT disgrace is what you call a competitive offense, The GB offense by comparison should be ready for the Super Bowl... To face the Bills, of course... 
__________________
Idaho Vandals Fan
Green Bay Packers Fan
|
|
|
05-18-2006, 01:36 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
TGM Trillionaire
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philly boy in Cali
Posts: 33,859
|
i agree with you for the most part storm, although I do think that pollard is a good TE, but was in a poor offense with a poor QB. Also, Roy Williams can be inconsistent, I wouldn't call him a bust yet. I also wouldn't call mike williams a bust as he has only played one year, WR need 3 years before they are determined to be busts. It may behoove m williams to move to TE, if he can get the blocking schemes down.
|
|
|
05-18-2006, 08:12 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Powder puff all-star
Join Date: May 2006
Location: woodhaven michigan
Posts: 179
|
hey driver if u dont have any offense u cant score points and if u dont score points u cant win games he bears offense hurt them last year in the playoffs becuase hey had no offense
|
|
|
05-18-2006, 09:05 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
FBF QB
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Burbs of Philly
Posts: 273
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by professorellisdtrails
i agree with you for the most part storm, although I do think that pollard is a good TE, but was in a poor offense with a poor QB. Also, Roy Williams can be inconsistent, I wouldn't call him a bust yet. I also wouldn't call mike williams a bust as he has only played one year, WR need 3 years before they are determined to be busts. It may behoove m williams to move to TE, if he can get the blocking schemes down.
|
I read his post and was about to post the same thing. It's MUCH too early to call those WR's a bust. It's kind of hard to prove how good you are when your QB can't get you the ball due to lack of talent on the O-line.
Bears take the division once again.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|