Thread Tools

Display Modes

KWilliamsAWinfield · 07-02-2006, 12:05 AM

Quote:

<ing' date='Jul 1st '06 @ 11:39 pm' post='1606992']
Bad news for Bears fans - dude had a monster season.
He'll look great in a Skins uniform

[/b]

Hey man, I am wondering who is your starting linebacker since Lavar left?

O · 07-02-2006, 12:47 AM

Quote:

<ing' date='Jul 2nd '06 @ 12:39 am' post='1606992']
Bad news for Bears fans - dude had a monster season.
He'll look great in a Skins uniform

[/b]

URL54MVP · 07-02-2006, 12:57 AM

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(GrossPeanuts @ Jul 2nd ) [snapback]1606958[/snapback]</div>

Quote:

I've lost a lot of respect for the guy. Must need to pay his insurance for all of his exotic cars...
[/b]

Bah, the NFL is a business. He is not a slave to Chicago for life.

94SupraTT · 07-02-2006, 01:56 AM

Quote:

<ing' date='Jul 1st '06 @ 11:39 pm' post='1606992']
Bad news for Bears fans - dude had a monster season.
He'll look great in a Skins uniform

[/b]

So did Colvin and so did Holdman. Playing next to #54 makes good LBs look like superstars. Where was Briggs when Urlacher was hurt? When #54 wasn't on the field Briggs didn't look nearly as impressive. Now thats not to say I don't like Briggs because I do. However Briggs IMO is a product of a scheme that makes Will LBs stars and that coupled with him playing next to #54 makes him look better than he is.

Lego · 07-02-2006, 01:57 AM

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(KWilliamsAWinfield @ Jul 2nd ) [snapback]1607031[/snapback]</div>

Quote:

Hey man, I am wondering who is your starting linebacker since Lavar left?
[/b]

the same guy who was starting while lavar was on the bench all last season?

BBBF · 07-02-2006, 02:32 AM

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(94SupraTT @ Jul 2nd ) [snapback]1607162[/snapback]</div>

Quote:

So did Colvin and so did Holdman. Playing next to #54 makes good LBs look like superstars. Where was Briggs when Urlacher was hurt? When #54 wasn't on the field Briggs didn't look nearly as impressive. Now thats not to say I don't like Briggs because I do. However Briggs IMO is a product of a scheme that makes Will LBs stars and that coupled with him playing next to #54 makes him look better than he is. [/b]

Why did everyone forget that Briggs put up good numbers while Urlacher was injured? Let's look at what he did in 2004:

Started all 16 games at WLB after moving from SLB in the off-season and lead Bears in tackles
Led team in tackles in 8 games including 2 games with career-high 17
Named Pro Bowl second-alternate at OLB after recording 168 tackles including 10 TFLs and 0.5 sack
Produced one of Bears team-record six defensive TDs with INT return score

]<ing · 07-02-2006, 09:14 AM

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(KWilliamsAWinfield @ Jul 1st ) [snapback]1607031[/snapback]</div>

Quote:

Hey man, I am wondering who is your starting linebacker since Lavar left?
[/b]

probably Holdman, since it's unlikely they'll start that rookie McIntosh.

]<ing · 07-02-2006, 09:16 AM

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(94SupraTT @ Jul 2nd ) [snapback]1607162[/snapback]</div>

Quote:

So did Colvin and so did Holdman. Playing next to #54 makes good LBs look like superstars. Where was Briggs when Urlacher was hurt? When #54 wasn't on the field Briggs didn't look nearly as impressive. Now thats not to say I don't like Briggs because I do. However Briggs IMO is a product of a scheme that makes Will LBs stars and that coupled with him playing next to #54 makes him look better than he is.
[/b]

Who's #54?

Oh - you mean that dude that Bettis steamrolled?