[scottc]

Originally Posted by BamaChamps

What are you saying? Winning does makes you right. Losing certianly does not. To this point in the season none of the current ranked SEC teams has lost OOC. Notre Dame has beaten a ranked team in the Big 12 Oklahoma, Big 10 Mich, and PAC 12 Stanford.

As dense as ever. Having your team win does not necessarily make your arguments right. But the fact that you believe it doesnt do any wonders of the stereotype that SEC fans are stupid.
Example:
scottc: I think the world is round.
BamaChamps: I think the world is a cube.
(Alabama then proceeds to win the national title)
BamaChamps: See, Alabama won, therefore I am right. The world is a cube and is not round.

next thing you know, you are going to start telling me about how you have a lucky t-shirt that you wear during game time and how that causes bama to win...

Originally Posted by BamaChamps

So the only objective factor (winning on the field) doesn't matter because the SEC is destroying the competition, but your opinion does. OOC games against ranked teams, bowl games against ranked teams and teams with comparable records, and how your conference does in championships games does matter and really are the only things that matters. Everything else is opinions.

I am pretty sure I gave facts and examples as to why the only objective factor is bias.
You do know what BIAS means dont you??

Here is an "objective factor":
Notre Dame has had more wins against the Big10 and Pac12 than the entire SEC conference. Therefore Notre Dame > SEC.

And dont give me any excuses because using the ONLY objective factor, it is clear that Notre Dame is better than the SEC, like 14 times better.

Originally Posted by BamaChamps

You sir, should stick to being a sore loser because you are so awesome at that.

We should probably save this quote for after you try to respond to this.

[BamaChamps]

Originally Posted by scottc

As dense as ever. Having your team win does not necessarily make your arguments right. But the fact that you believe it doesnt do any wonders of the stereotype that SEC fans are stupid.
Example:
scottc: I think the world is round.
BamaChamps: I think the world is a cube.
(Alabama then proceeds to win the national title)
BamaChamps: See, Alabama won, therefore I am right. The world is a cube and is not round.

Let me explain this way so even you can follow:
Team A beats Team B , therefore Team A is better than Team B. Not based on ScottC's laughable opinion but what actually happen on the field.

Originally Posted by scottc

next thing you know, you are going to start telling me about how you have a lucky t-shirt that you wear during game time and how that causes bama to win...

Luck doesn't cut it in the SEC son. You earn every yard.

Originally Posted by scottc

I am pretty sure I gave facts and examples as to why the only objective factor is bias.
You do know what BIAS means dont you??

Here is an "objective factor":
Notre Dame has had more wins against the Big10 and Pac12 than the entire SEC conference. Therefore Notre Dame > SEC.

And dont give me any excuses because using the ONLY objective factor, it is clear that Notre Dame is better than the SEC, like 14 times better.

That only proves that ND has played those two conferences more times than the SEC has. Here's a little logic for you and I hope its not too far over your head. A valid argument cannot have all true premises but a false conclusion.

Originally Posted by scottc

We should probably save this quote for after you try to respond to this.

Agreed its entertaining watching you continue to embarrase yourself.

[Spartan Havoc]

Originally Posted by scottc

As dense as ever. Having your team win does not necessarily make your arguments right. But the fact that you believe it doesnt do any wonders of the stereotype that SEC fans are stupid.
Example:
scottc: I think the world is round.
BamaChamps: I think the world is a cube.
(Alabama then proceeds to win the national title)
BamaChamps: See, Alabama won, therefore I am right. The world is a cube and is not round.

next thing you know, you are going to start telling me about how you have a lucky t-shirt that you wear during game time and how that causes bama to win...


I am pretty sure I gave facts and examples as to why the only objective factor is bias.
You do know what BIAS means dont you??

Here is an "objective factor":
Notre Dame has had more wins against the Big10 and Pac12 than the entire SEC conference. Therefore Notre Dame > SEC.

And dont give me any excuses because using the ONLY objective factor, it is clear that Notre Dame is better than the SEC, like 14 times better.


We should probably save this quote for after you try to respond to this.

Just leave the troll alone. He's probably one of those people who think Bama could beat Jacksonville. He'll leave the forum soon enough after Saban retires and joins some other big school in another conference like another one did. (Maybe Miami?) We'll see.

[BamaChamps]

Originally Posted by Spartan Havoc

Just leave the troll alone. He's probably one of those people who think Bama could beat Jacksonville. He'll leave the forum soon enough after Saban retires and joins some other big school in another conference like another one did. (Maybe Miami?) We'll see.

Your team failed hard and you join them by failing harder at being a mod. A team of all time college pros could not beat the worst NFL team ever. I'm amazed that what Steve Spurrier a rivial coach jokingly said about Bama is getting this much attention. I have not heard one person say anything other than Spurrier was either joking or a buffoon for making that comment.

If Saban was too leave I would thank him for getting us back on top, for giving us this chance at a dynasty (3 titles in 4 years], and his protege Def Coordinator Kirby Smart would probably take over.

I really appreciated the 49-7 beatdown he delivered to your Spartans.

[WeWantTheVest]

Originally Posted by Spartan Havoc

Just leave the troll alone. He's probably one of those people who think Bama could beat Jacksonville. He'll leave the forum soon enough after Saban retires and joins some other big school in another conference like another one did. (Maybe Miami?) We'll see.

Saban back to MSU and Dantonio back to Ohio State as DC sounds pretty good to me.

[Chise]

Originally Posted by WeWantTheVest

Saban back to MSU and Dantonio back to Ohio State as DC sounds pretty good to me.

If those schools were able to make that happen, those would be two pretty nice coups.

[scottc]

Originally Posted by Spartan Havoc

Just leave the troll alone.

Probably good advice.
Troll doesnt understand logic, valid arguments and is completely blinded by anything anti-alabama.

I guess it would be a good idea to block this idiot.

[BamaChamps]

Originally Posted by WeWantTheVest

Saban back to MSU and Dantonio back to Ohio State as DC sounds pretty good to me.

Why would Saban downgrade? wishful thinking that is all

[BamaChamps]

Originally Posted by scottc

Probably good advice.
Troll doesnt understand logic, valid arguments and is completely blinded by anything anti-alabama.

I guess it would be a good idea to block this idiot.

Newsflash, you are posting in my thread so how exactly am I the troll here? Furthermore, you called me out in your post and now you act surprise that I respond and countered your inept argument. By the way how is Cal doing this year?

[scottc]

Originally Posted by BamaChamps

Newsflash, you are posting in my thread so how exactly am I the troll here? Furthermore, you called me out in your post and now you act surprise that I respond and countered your inept argument. By the way how is Cal doing this year?

The progress of Cal has nothing to do with my arguments, just like no matter how successful Alabama is, it wont increase your IQ above 50.