[MountaineersFan]

Originally Posted by BamaChamps

Let me explain this way so even you can follow:
Team A beats Team B , therefore Team A is better than Team B. Not based on ScottC's laughable opinion but what actually happen on the field.

So, if Team A beats Team B and Team C beats Team A but loses to Team B....who is the better team???

[scottc]

Originally Posted by MountaineersFan

So, if Team A beats Team B and Team C beats Team A but loses to Team B....who is the better team???

Adding a 3rd team to the equation? I dont think he will ever figure that out.

I would also like to revisit the 2 team equation.

"Team A beats Team B , therefore Team A is better than Team B. "
So if, for example, Team A beats Team B 9-6 on a random date... lets say Nov 5th 2011... who is the better team, Team A or Team B?
And when answering the question, lets remember that Team A was the Divisional and Conference Champion. And not just any conference champion, the SEC CONFERENCE CHAMPION.

[GEAUXTIGERS]

the SEC isnt good. no matter who they beat. what they have done. If they beat a "good" team its only because that team was overhyped. The facts dont matter. its all just a big rigged system. SEC teams could beat every ranked team by 50 this year. That means nothing because those teams they beat would then, at that point, be overhyped.- scottc logic- then revert to personal attacks on how stupid southerns are. Scottc youre so smart, I wish I could be as enlightened as you.

[scottc]

Originally Posted by GEAUXTIGERS

the SEC isnt good. no matter who they beat. what they have done. If they beat a "good" team its only because that team was overhyped. The facts dont matter. its all just a big rigged system. SEC teams could beat every ranked team by 50 this year. That means nothing because those teams they beat would then, at that point, be overhyped.- scottc logic- then revert to personal attacks on how stupid southerns are. Scottc youre so smart, I wish I could be as enlightened as you.

sarcasm noted. but before you try the reverse attack on me, please answer the above post about which team is better, team a or team b. and if you ever figure that out, please answer which team is better, team a, b, or c.

its sad that you play the "oh, everyone thinks SEC is over-hyped" when i specifically stated that the conference as a whole isnt over-rated (http://www.footballforum.com/college...ml#post2569788)

i gave SPECIFIC examples on how your analysis is incorrect, (http://www.footballforum.com/college...ml#post2569971) yet you fail to respond and instead change the subject as stated above.

the only thing that I can consider you being truely stupid is IF you sided with an idiot like BamaChamps.

[Canadian Speed]

Originally Posted by MountaineersFan

So, if Team A beats Team B and Team C beats Team A but loses to Team B....who is the better team???

The answer isn't going to be A, B, or C based on JUST these three records... In this case, it's about whom else each of these variables have won and lost against.