Thread Tools

Display Modes

**BeastJacobs** · 12-29-2007, 03:11 PM

I do.

**Dawardoe** · 12-29-2007, 06:27 PM

I think K-Train has a point so I'm going to go with random order.

**Serrated Shadow** · 12-29-2007, 07:08 PM

IMO it's a done deal. Random order it is..

Now who's going to come back next year?

**Dawardoe** · 12-29-2007, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Serrated Shadow

IMO it's a done deal. Random order it is..

Now who's going to come back next year?

Dawardoe

**BeastJacobs** · 12-30-2007, 07:17 AM

Me for sure.

**P-Rez25** · 12-31-2007, 09:43 AM

random order draft, 3-4 keepers, no bonuses, sounds good to me

**P-Rez25** · 12-31-2007, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dawardoe

So, he can draft Micheal Vick LOL. It was his own fault though b/c he didn't show up for the draft.

in Hammers defense Vick didnt start getting into serious trouble until after we did our draft but before the season started. im not sure if Vick wouldve been a good pick this year anyways but he wouldve been at the very least a Vince Young type of pick

**ball in the baskett** · 12-31-2007, 10:28 AM

Im definitly in

**Serrated Shadow** · 12-31-2007, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by P-Rez25

in Hammers defense Vick didnt start getting into serious trouble until after we did our draft but before the season started. im not sure if Vick wouldve been a good pick this year anyways but he wouldve been at the very least a Vince Young type of pick

It wasn't long after Vick had been indited though. That's why ESPN had dropped Vick in the rankings but Hammer got him still.

**Dawardoe** · 12-31-2007, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by P-Rez25

in Hammers defense Vick didnt start getting into serious trouble until after we did our draft but before the season started. im not sure if Vick wouldve been a good pick this year anyways but he wouldve been at the very least a Vince Young type of pick

You do have a point there...

Thread Tools Display Modes

View more football photos

Thread Tools

Display Modes