Originally posted by Legobedan@Sep 8th '05 @ 12:05 pm i think Heap gets 8. how many TDs do you think we score? prolly not many more than 8.
I think you guys score around 26 on offense, and I'm hoping that 10 of those are Lewis. Which leaves 16 for the TE and receivers. If Heap gets 8, then Mason, Hymes, Clayton, and Moore split 8.
Originally posted by The Bitter Truth@Sep 8th '05 @ 1:46 pm I think you guys score around 26 on offense, and I'm hoping that 10 of those are Lewis. Which leaves 16 for the TE and receivers. If Heap gets 8, then Mason, Hymes, Clayton, and Moore split 8.
Guys, I would normally agree on taking an RB at #4. In fact, I took an RB first round in every other draft I was in. However, the dropoff in points for QB in this league is fairly significant. 2-3 points per game is huge.
Not to mention, I don't think Rudi Johnson is a bad pick for the second round, nor Mike Anderson for the fourth. I could've had McGahee, Lewis, etc.; but I can't say that I think they are worth it over Rudi or even Anderson.
Originally posted by Kliquid@Sep 8th '05 @ 2:10 pm Guys, I would normally agree on taking an RB at #4. In fact, I took an RB first round in every other draft I was in. However, the dropoff in points for QB in this league is fairly significant. 2-3 points per game is huge.
Not to mention, I don't think Rudi Johnson is a bad pick for the second round, nor Mike Anderson for the fourth. I could've had McGahee, Lewis, etc.; but I can't say that I think they are worth it over Rudi or even Anderson.
How many QBs do you start? How many RBs do you start? Case closed. 1 RB in the first 3 rounds ain't gonna cut it.
Originally posted by Kliquid@Sep 8th '05 @ 1:10 pm Guys, I would normally agree on taking an RB at #4. In fact, I took an RB first round in every other draft I was in. However, the dropoff in points for QB in this league is fairly significant. 2-3 points per game is huge.
Not to mention, I don't think Rudi Johnson is a bad pick for the second round, nor Mike Anderson for the fourth. I could've had McGahee, Lewis, etc.; but I can't say that I think they are worth it over Rudi or even Anderson.
Originally posted by Legobedan@Sep 8th '05 @ 12:42 pm yeah, you took a second-round QB with the #4 overall pick. he woulda been there.
No he wouldn't. Donovan McNabb, Peyton Manning, and Kerry Collins were all taken before I could pick in the second round. Top QB's score an asinine amount of points in this league.
Rudi Johnson + Mike Anderson + Daunte Culpepper > Willis McGahee + Rudi Johnson + Jake Plummer (or another mid-level QB)
People like to act like Mike Anderson isn't going to put up numbers. He will. He's in Denver. He's done it before. RUEBEN DROUGHNS ran for 1000+ yards last year in Denver. Any scrub can do well there.
The point dropoff between a guy like Daunte Culpepper and one like Jake Plummer is a LOT bigger than the one between McGahee and Anderson.
Originally posted by Kliquid@Sep 8th '05 @ 2:57 pm No he wouldn't. Donovan McNabb, Peyton Manning, and Kerry Collins were all taken before I could pick in the second round. Top QB's score an asinine amount of points in this league.
sooooo, culpepper would've still been on the board then.
My final fantasy team this year
Which leaves 16 for the TE and receivers. If Heap gets 8, then Mason, Hymes, Clayton, and Moore split 8. 
Linear Mode
