 |
|
05-09-2007, 06:29 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Off The Grid
Posts: 38,682
|
Lego can be excluded from this conversation because his **** is super covert top secret voo-doo. Is Peterson the top pick or is it Lynch or Johnson? Who do you like for IDP's? Poz? Willis?
Discuss.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
05-09-2007, 06:35 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 24,396
|
I'm too big of a homer to say anything. 
|
|
|
05-09-2007, 06:37 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 29,973
|
You look at the guy with most talent IMO. Situations change so rapidly in the NFL, unless its a guy in a proven system (Addai, Denver Backs) its not worth passing up on superior talent.
I'll be taking Peterson barring injury or major unforseen events.
__________________
Bye NFL-Fans
|
|
|
05-09-2007, 06:37 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Office
Posts: 32,199
|
Peterson ftw.
Willis IDP
__________________
|
|
|
05-09-2007, 06:41 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 29,973
|
For IDP's? Well at DL, it's Carriker 110%... hes the kind of DE who's gonna rack up tackles in a league where sacks barely matter. Gaines Adams, Jamaal Anderson... sack guys, pretty much worthless in this league.
At LB the initial reaction from everybody is Willis, but I doubt it really. Im looking at Poz or possibly in much later rounds Okwo, who if he takes over at WILL for the Bears -- well you know what #'s those guys put up. Willis will be good, but not good enough to reach with plenty of other players still around.
DB's? LaRon Landry. Nobody else is even worth draftng until Round 4.
__________________
Bye NFL-Fans
|
|
|
05-09-2007, 07:04 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 43,214
|
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(The Bitter Truth @ May 9th ) [snapback]1996544[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
Lego can be excluded from this conversation because his **** is super covert top secret voo-doo. Is Peterson the top pick or is it Lynch or Johnson? Who do you like for IDP's? Poz? Willis?
Discuss.
[/b]
|
 just because i don't necessarily don't tell the whole truth doesn't mean I don't tell most of the truth. let's just say that I feel there are 8 very good prospects before it drops off, and that I don't feel there is necessarily a clear #1.
i am definitely not a fan of Brady Quinn in Cleveland. I think Calvin Johnson is good to go for the next year but he is a Lion and Kitna will only be their QB for another year before they draft a QB, and Martz is probably not there much after that. But he's probably the #1 right now. I think Lynch in Buffalo is intriguing and a better early prospect than Adrian Peterson, because Peterson will probably platoon for a while, but he's definitely the long-term pick. I think the guy most people will be too low on is Craig Davis. Before he got drafted in the first round I know I had him pegged as a guy I'd target a round or two earlier than projected just to make sure I got him. I think he'll have a great shot at early and often production in Norv's offense.
__________________

AIM: grandoompahpah
|
|
|
05-09-2007, 07:12 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,941
|
Chester Taylor will have more action than Peterson. Calvin Johnson will have more impact, especially with defenses still targeting Roy Williams. So that puts Calvin Johnson #1. Watch out for Ted Ginn Jr too, same situation, almost as good as CJ. Him #2. Peterson #3.
1. Calvin Johnson
2. Ted Ginn
3. Adrian Peterson
__________________

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Brooklyn @ Aug 15th ) [snapback]2074365[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
|
hey ur a****in idiot rofl u faggit u like dick up ur buutt
|
|
|
|
05-09-2007, 07:19 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 43,214
|
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(PeanutTillman @ May 9th ) [snapback]1996555[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
For IDP's? Well at DL, it's Carriker 110%... hes the kind of DE who's gonna rack up tackles in a league where sacks barely matter. Gaines Adams, Jamaal Anderson... sack guys, pretty much worthless in this league.
At LB the initial reaction from everybody is Willis, but I doubt it really. Im looking at Poz or possibly in much later rounds Okwo, who if he takes over at WILL for the Bears -- well you know what #'s those guys put up. Willis will be good, but not good enough to reach with plenty of other players still around.
DB's? LaRon Landry. Nobody else is even worth draftng until Round 4.
[/b]
|
Wrong wrong and wrong. I don't think you could possibly be more wrong.
For DL it is clearly Gaines Adams. Think simeon rice...and the conversation is over. Plus you're a moron for thinking sacks don't matter. They were 3x a tackle last year. The best guys, obviously, racked up tackles AND sacks. Now that they're 4x you'll see more passrushers slipping in. Either way, Adams in TB is >>>> Carriker in St.L.
LB is clearly Willis. Ray Lewis was putting up 150-160 tackles with Mike Nolan and expect Willis to do the same. His defense funnels guys to that position just like the bears funnel guys to the WLB. Yeah, Poz is playing in a good position, too, but many consider him out of position at MLB, and though the difference between their upsides may not be great, the "sure thing" is Willis. I don't think Beason is far behind them, either.
DB's cannot be Landry. Even Sean Taylor hasn't put up numbers in their system. And yeah, Landry will be playing closer to the line but not close enough to get significant numbers ahead of their three stellar LBs. From a fantasy perspective, I think either Griffin or Nelson will be better picks. Look at what Hope did in Tennessee...seriously, Hope. And Nelson should be the beneficiary of a lot of teams being forced to pass because they cannot run. Griffin has a shot at 100 tackles and a few INTs, Nelson will probably be looking at 85-90 tackles and a few INTs. Landry will be upside at just under that.
__________________

AIM: grandoompahpah
|
|
|
05-09-2007, 07:26 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,111
|
I'd key into that cat indy drafted #32.... if he can catch, Peyton will get him da ball.
__________________

sig by da_bears86
Congrats on 500 Big Hurt .
|
|
|
05-09-2007, 07:31 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Off The Grid
Posts: 38,682
|
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Lego @ May 9th ) [snapback]1996586[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
Wrong wrong and wrong. I don't think you could possibly be more wrong.
For DL it is clearly Gaines Adams. Think simeon rice...and the conversation is over. Plus you're a moron for thinking sacks don't matter. They were 3x a tackle last year. The best guys, obviously, racked up tackles AND sacks. Now that they're 4x you'll see more passrushers slipping in. Either way, Adams in TB is >>>> Carriker in St.L.
LB is clearly Willis. Ray Lewis was putting up 150-160 tackles with Mike Nolan and expect Willis to do the same. His defense funnels guys to that position just like the bears funnel guys to the WLB. Yeah, Poz is playing in a good position, too, but many consider him out of position at MLB, and though the difference between their upsides may not be great, the "sure thing" is Willis. I don't think Beason is far behind them, either.
DB's cannot be Landry. Even Sean Taylor hasn't put up numbers in their system. And yeah, Landry will be playing closer to the line but not close enough to get significant numbers ahead of their three stellar LBs. From a fantasy perspective, I think either Griffin or Nelson will be better picks. Look at what Hope did in Tennessee...seriously, Hope. And Nelson should be the beneficiary of a lot of teams being forced to pass because they cannot run. Griffin has a shot at 100 tackles and a few INTs, Nelson will probably be looking at 85-90 tackles and a few INTs. Landry will be upside at just under that.
[/b]
|
I agree. Except Griffin won't get anywhere near 100 tackles. They are attempting to play him at cornerback.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|