Thread Tools

Display Modes

**RoyWilliams** · 05-09-2008, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Serrated Shadow

I think we should keep it to two WR's honestly. I know the rules used to say that you could have the option of three, but that'd make everyone have to draft nickel CB's as well to compensate for it, which will get kinda difficult to figure out when i make the rosters up.

That would suck because i could have taken one of the great FBs earlier.

**Professor** · 05-09-2008, 02:09 PM

Did you just assign Witten to Roy's Team? lol

**RoyWilliams** · 05-09-2008, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Professor

Did you just assign Witten to Roy's Team? lol

No i took him with my pick before Chad Johnson.

**Professor** · 05-09-2008, 02:12 PM

Nevermind I updated the first page, Roy picks and then Prez is up.

**RoyWilliams** · 05-09-2008, 02:15 PM

I stand by my pick of Chad Johnson. The rules when i made my pick said we could take 3 WRs. If i would have known id be forced to take a FB i would have taken one earlier. Thats bogus to change after 18 rounds.

**Professor** · 05-09-2008, 02:22 PM

Roy has a point there about that. If that is the case then I need to rethink my Kieth Jackson pick, maybe. Might need a FA pickup or something, lol. I feel comfortable with my db's against three WR's. No matter what Grunt's team is so good and I can see all the players playing well together under the same scheme as well as mine.

**Serrated Shadow** · 05-09-2008, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Professor

Roy has a point there about that. If that is the case then I need to rethink my Kieth Jackson pick, maybe. Might need a FA pickup or something, lol. I feel comfortable with my db's against three WR's. No matter what Grunt's team is so good and I can see all the players playing well together under the same scheme as well as mine.

Alright screw it then. I don't see how Roy can lose now with those three WR's. How the **** are you supposed to cover that?