 |
|
03-28-2006, 01:05 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Team Gridiron Masters!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: is right in front of the computer
Posts: 3,836
|
Packers Re-Sign Running Back Davenport
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060328/...N5bnN1YmNhdA--
Davenport, who missed part of last season with a broken ankle, joins Ahman Green and William Henderson as running backs to re-sign with the Packers as unrestricted free agents.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
03-28-2006, 05:29 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cedar Mills
Posts: 5,593
|
they are overloaded with runningbacks.
__________________
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 05:37 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Slightly north of Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,819
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MickeyG
they are overloaded with runningbacks.
|
No we're not. Herron will be cut, and Henderson is a FB. That leaves Gado, Green and Davenport, and since this is Green's final year, we can phase him out while we train two younger runners. Not a bad strategy, seems it worked for the Steelers.
__________________
Idaho Vandals Fan
Green Bay Packers Fan
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 05:57 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Team Gridiron Masters!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: is right in front of the computer
Posts: 3,836
|
What's the word on Davenports foot though? I heard all he could get was deals that had a bunch of clauses because he was so injury prone, I wanted the Eagles to take a shot at him.
All in all I like the move though, the more they can run the better and having them 3 is a nice start IMO.
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 06:09 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Slightly north of Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,819
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigboy10182000
What's the word on Davenports foot though? I heard all he could get was deals that had a bunch of clauses because he was so injury prone, I wanted the Eagles to take a shot at him.
All in all I like the move though, the more they can run the better and having them 3 is a nice start IMO.
|
A broken ankle should heal fine. I'm more worried about Green's injury than Davenport's. I wouldn't call him injury prone either. He's just not an agile runner. He plows through lines thinking he's as big as Bettis, but he's not, so he gets hurt. He'll be fine as long as he splits carries, and in this new Atlanta-style RBBC plan Jagodzinski has, he will fit in nicely as the power runner.
__________________
Idaho Vandals Fan
Green Bay Packers Fan
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 07:30 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
FBF All Star Running Back!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 878
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stormdriver
No we're not. Herron will be cut, and Henderson is a FB. That leaves Gado, Green and Davenport, and since this is Green's final year, we can phase him out while we train two younger runners. Not a bad strategy, seems it worked for the Steelers.
|
Storm the steelers had alot of things the packers dont right now. an Interior line, a defense.
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 11:35 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
R.I.P. Palpatine
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mn
Posts: 542
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stormdriver
A broken ankle should heal fine. I'm more worried about Green's injury than Davenport's. I wouldn't call him injury prone either. He's just not an agile runner. He plows through lines thinking he's as big as Bettis, but he's not, so he gets hurt. He'll be fine as long as he splits carries, and in this new Atlanta-style RBBC plan Jagodzinski has, he will fit in nicely as the power runner.
|
I think the RBBC phrase doesn't really apply in this case, IMO, according to your argument about davenport being the power runner, storm. just because a team uses two RB's doesn't mean they have a RBBC situation. it just means they have two backs with different styles they use in different situations throughout the game. when I think of RBBC, I think of the vikings the last couple years. they have been using a bunch of backs because they can't find one that really seems to be any better than the others, so they just keep plugging guys in hoping something works. that's my take on RBBC, but that's just my opinion.
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 11:46 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
FBF All Star Running Back!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 878
|
Can some one tell the packers that there are other positions then RB.
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 11:36 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Slightly north of Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,819
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by juggalo6772
Storm the steelers had alot of things the packers dont right now. an Interior line, a defense.
|
We should have a pretty good defense this year too. That is the stated goal of the GM at least. We're not the Steelers, and I am not saying we will be. A Super Bowl is not within reach for years to come. I do have a lot of faith in the new coaches however.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pumzy
I think the RBBC phrase doesn't really apply in this case, IMO, according to your argument about davenport being the power runner, storm. just because a team uses two RB's doesn't mean they have a RBBC situation. it just means they have two backs with different styles they use in different situations throughout the game.
|
If that's your take, then fine, I will not call it RBBC. We have three RB's that will split carries. Green and Gado, and Davenport as a power runner. Green will probably not be what he was after a severe injury last season anyway, so it will be good to not have him be the main man. I'm happy about it anyway.
__________________
Idaho Vandals Fan
Green Bay Packers Fan
|
|
|
03-30-2006, 12:51 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
DaveyGravy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 304
|
Yeah I wish Miami would have gotten Davenport. He is BIG! I also think its hilarious watching him return kicks. Its almost like watching the bus as a PR. And Gado is a power runner too. I think the only finesse back left in the mix is Green, and he isnt that finesse. You may miss Fisher in the passing game. He always opened up more options.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|