Reply

Old 03-13-2007, 08:18 PM   #1 (permalink)
PackSACK92
FBF Pro Bowler
 
PackSACK92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Whitewater, WI
Posts: 1,247
PackSACK92 is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Report: Packers leaders to discuss trade for MossESPN.com news services


GREEN BAY, Wisc. -- The Green Bay Packers' leadership is expected to discuss a potential trade for wide receiver Randy Moss when it meets on Tuesday.


Randy Moss
Wide Receiver
Oakland Raiders

Profile
2006 SEASON STATISTICS
Rec Yds TD Avg Long YAC
42 553 3 13.2 51 127


A trade sending Moss from the Oakland Raiders to Green Bay is already in discussion stages, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported, saying according to an unnamed league source, general manager Ted Thompson has already been in direct talks with Raiders owner Al Davis about the move. According to sources, the teams have discussed the trade for a month and the Packers have been given permission to talk to Moss' agent about restructuring his contract.

"They're going to get rid of him," the source said, according to the Journal-Sentinel. "I think they think they can trade him. And I know Green Bay has interest."


Thompson has refused to discuss whether he would deal for Moss. The newspaper reported Tim DiPiero, Moss's agent, was unavailable for comment.


"Ted has not spent a lot of time talking to me about it, quite honestly," Packers chairman of the board Bob Harlan told the Journal-Sentinel. "Ted always starts out our meetings with a football report so he may get into that."

Harlan told the newspaper he has been taking calls, faxes and e-mails from Packers fans on the possible trade, with negative responses still outnumbering the positive. "I'd say it's been maybe 65-35 percent [anti-Moss]," Harlan said. He also said the Packers remain concerned about player character issues and public perception of the team as a classy organization.


"One man wrote, 'Moody. Excess baggage. Disruptive. Do any of these words sound like alarm bells to you?' " Harlan told the Journal-Sentinel. "One guy called from out of state and said, 'Bob, I'd rather see you go 0-16 than do that.' Isn't that something?"

But not all the feedback on Moss is negative, he added.

"People say to me, 'Brett [Favre] needs a big target. I know he's got baggage but he's never hurt anybody,' " Harlan told the newspaper. "Today, they were all, 'Take a chance.'"[/b]



I still hope it happens...
__________________
Green Bay Packers World Champions
1929, 1930, 1931, 1936, 1939, 1944, 1961, 1962, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1996



PackSACK92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 03-13-2007, 08:46 PM   #2 (permalink)
krzyroone
FBF Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 2,453
krzyroone is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I think it would extend Favre's career, if he wants to keep playing. Driver, Jennings and Moss - pretty sick if you ask me.
krzyroone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 02:47 AM   #3 (permalink)
O
FBF Hall Of Famer
 
O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,833
O is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

A little TE production on top of that (in current players or new ones) and a decent running game and he'll be all set for however long he wants to stick around.
__________________

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SteelAngel @ Jun 7th ) [snapback]2019210[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
you people are always talking about arrogance
We regret to inform you that your country is dead because it was stupid.
O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 06:38 PM   #4 (permalink)
PackSACK92
FBF Pro Bowler
 
PackSACK92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Whitewater, WI
Posts: 1,247
PackSACK92 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(O @ Mar 14th ) [snapback]1925311[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
A little TE production on top of that (in current players or new ones) and a decent running game and he'll be all set for however long he wants to stick around.
[/b]

Yeah, if we get Moss, draft Lynch and draft a TE in the later rounds we'd be looking pretty set on Offense. We'd have 3 legit passing threats in our WR's, and 4 total with Lynch. All that would take the pressure off our TE's for catching passes and let Franks and who ever else block most of the time. Which is a very good thing for Franks.
__________________
Green Bay Packers World Champions
1929, 1930, 1931, 1936, 1939, 1944, 1961, 1962, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1996



PackSACK92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 06:49 PM   #5 (permalink)
imported_SCT352
FBF QB
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 281
imported_SCT352 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

A Moss trade could bring a downfall to Farve though. If he gets too gun happy like in 2005. His INT's could go through the roof. But the addition of Moss should make them a playoff contender, if then can also shore up the "D" a little more.
__________________
2006 NFC CHAMPIONS
imported_SCT352 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 08:54 PM   #6 (permalink)
imported_JARHEAD
FBF Coach
 
imported_JARHEAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,123
imported_JARHEAD is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

**** you Ted Thomson.

You to Childress.
__________________
Offensive Game Plan: Run on 1st, Run on 2nd, Pray on 3rd.

--Props to Trev for the sig--
imported_JARHEAD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 08:55 PM   #7 (permalink)
imported_litlharsh
FBF Hall Of Famer
 
imported_litlharsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 15,569
imported_litlharsh is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I will post a picture of me crying if this trade goes through.

Just Kidding. But I'll cry
__________________
Count 1

All Defendents are in a vast interconnect conspiracy to kidnap my mind.
Defendents have a secret headquarters where the Detroit Tigers play Football
imported_litlharsh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 09:01 PM   #8 (permalink)
r8erray
FBF Pro Bowler
 
r8erray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,179
r8erray is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I want Moss to get traded but I don't think it's gonna happen I don't think we're gonna get enough for him
__________________
r8erray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 09:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
imported_BCheezy
FBF Coach
 
imported_BCheezy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,941
imported_BCheezy is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Might as well just get rid of him.. he's making too much money for how he's been playing. You're not going to the playoffs anytime soon, get a 1st round draft pick or even 2nd instead of keeping him.
__________________

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Brooklyn @ Aug 15th ) [snapback]2074365[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
hey ur a****in idiot rofl u faggit u like dick up ur buutt
imported_BCheezy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 09:25 PM   #10 (permalink)
PackSACK92
FBF Pro Bowler
 
PackSACK92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Whitewater, WI
Posts: 1,247
PackSACK92 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SCT352 @ Mar 14th ) [snapback]1926380[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
A Moss trade could bring a downfall to Farve though. If he gets too gun happy like in 2005. His INT's could go through the roof. But the addition of Moss should make them a playoff contender, if then can also shore up the "D" a little more.
[/b]

Yeah, I could see him doing that in a couple games if we had to play catch-up. We lost about 3 games last season by 7 or less and that was mainly because we couldn't score TD's in the red zone, adding Moss should help change that. The D isn't a concern at all. We're kinda weak at SS and very weak at Nickelback, that's all.
__________________
Green Bay Packers World Champions
1929, 1930, 1931, 1936, 1939, 1944, 1961, 1962, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1996



PackSACK92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios