Originally Posted by professorellisdtrails

Reggie Bush has always had talent around him that has enabled him to succeed, when duece wasn't there in the beginning as much, bush did nothing, how long did it take him to score a TD. On houston, with a terrible oline, a terrible QB and almost no talent anywhere, he would have been keyed on completely and destroyed by defenses and most likely would have finished the season on the IR.

so you remember how in another thread we agreed that Amobi Okoye is most pro ready for the style of defense that houston has around him, you agreed, well in the NFL, team style and systems mean A WHOLE LOT, In New Orleans, they have weapons at RB, WR, great QB, oline. this enables Bush to get some space and make his moves, but on a team where he would be the prime focus, it would been an obvious bad situation.

Bush is better than Williams as a player in a ranking of players in the NFL, no question, but Mario Williams had a more positive impact on that defense and team as a whole, than bush would have had on the offense for the obvious and redundantly explained reasons that I and many others have pointed out to you

Originally Posted by chris_36824

585 rushing yards- 6 rushing touchdowns- 3.6 YPC

88 receptions- 2 receving touchdowns- 8.4 YPC

3+ 20 yard punt returns- 1 return touchdown- 7.7 YPR borderline inneffective
I would much... MUCH... rather have those numbers from my rookie than what Mario Williams had last year. Not only that but Reggie Bush is definitly gameplaned against WAY more than Mario Williams. He is a bigger factor on the field than Mario Williams now and will be for the rest of his career. I will guarentee that.

Originally Posted by chris_36824

I am 100% confident saying that Reggie Bush would of turned around that team faster than what Mario Williams will. If Mario Williams even ends up being the person who actually turns that team around, which he probably won't.