Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Teacherman
To not score any touchdowns offensively in the past two weeks (N.E. and S.F.) does not give me a lot of confidence that the Vikes can even win half of their remaining games. This is getting to be unbearable to watch the offense be so incompetent. I think that Childress needs to explore a change at Q.B. I know that everyone makes a big deal how Brad Johnson doesn't lose games for you by being careful, but he has not proven himself to win any games either by exceptional play. I do think that T. Jackson would not be such a bad idea at this point, even though Bollinger is #2 on the depth chart. I don't think that you gain much in arm strength and mobility with a switch from Johnson to Bollinger. Is the risk to Jackson's development worth the chance of jumpstarting the offense?
|
No kidding, the D can't win all the games by itself. The problem with Brad is that he ISN'T doing what everyone says he does anymore. He DOES make mistakes and he IS making the turnovers that Dumbte Fumblepepper always made, and Brad didn't in the past. THAT is the problem, along with no receivers worth a crap and a fat TE. I've been calling for T Jack to start for 2 weeks now, since Brad starting doing his Dumbte impersonation. I look at it 2 ways: You either start T Jack and the offense gets a spark needed to actually do something, and he gets experience for next year. The other way is that you get to evaluate him and see if he's going to be the future, and if he's not, at least you can make an informed decision on whether or not to take an elite QB prospect (Quinn, Brohm) in this year's draft if they're available, rather than passing on them cause they reached horribly on T Jack in the prior draft.
eay road ahead........
Linear Mode
