PoppaPoe33

Brady's good, but I'm not going to put him in the same catagory as Montana. Nope, won't do it.

__________________

20edREED20

Deion Branch isnt the best reciever or neither is Troy Brown but they are still good...very good possession recievers like i said...Yea Marino had Mark Clayton as a reciever,one of the best...But did he have that great of an O-LINE that Tom Brady has?....Tom Brady didnt lead to all those super bowls...He just has a great team all around him that made him look good...Im not taking anything away from Tom Brady

__________________

20edREED20

You know what I just noticed???..the thread is about montana,not marino lol.

__________________

patriotspride

take a look at some of the stats then come talk to me.ill take montana and brady over marino .

Footbalmaster

Brady is one of the best QB's ever and he's only 29 he could retire now and he would be a Hall of Famer.

20edREED20

No,not quite...He only looks so amazing because of how many super bowls he has won...Im not saying he isnt great cuz he is though.But IMO i dont think he would go to the hall if he reitered now.

__________________

patriotspride

brady is a first ballot hall of famer no question about it.

20edREED20

Yea but not at this time...In a few more years if he keeps it up then he will be a hall of famer, hands down.

__________________

ball in the baskett

marino also never won a superbowl

__________________

yoda9999

People often forget Montana won 2 Super Bowls before Rice was in the NFL. Brady is compared with Montana because both won SB's very early in their careers. Montana is lucky to have Rice later in his career, no doubt about it.

__________________