yoda9999

Yeah, I think so. When I define best QB I mean the total package. Not just a good passer or can win regular season games. But a leader, manage an offense through playoffs and the Super Bowl, has intangibles, has the respect of other players, inspires his teammates to do better, picks apart defenses, can pass to multitude of receivers, patient, cool under pressure, doesn't overheat, can win the big games.

__________________

patriotspride

they are both great.either one can play on my team.montana had alot more to work with jerry rice ring a bell.brady can take any reciever and if hes willing to work hard and run precise routes they will thrive with brady.

Footbalmaster

A quarterback is the only position that I can think about in sports that is defined by intangables such as winning and leadership. Brady will never be a Dan Morino, but Brady is a winner, plain and simple and the best winner for a quaterback is the best quaterback.

patriotspride

brady was and is better than marino ever was .

20edREED20

idk about that...Dan Marino never really had a running game...And he broke all those records with all that pressure on him...Tom Brady on the other hand has 2 good RBs and really always had a good running game,and great people all around him.

__________________

patriotspride

hes only had a good rb since 04 before that it was antwone smith marino had clayton and duper two excellent recievers .

20edREED20

Yea and Tom Brady had alot of possesion recievers...Deion Branch,Troy Brown and some others...And actually before cory dillon didnt he have Kevin Faulk i think his name was?

__________________

Footbalmaster

yea it was Faulk and Antwane Smith, but the biggest asset of a quarterback is a good receivor, Montana had Rice Brady has nobody for receivors.

satz

this thread is dumb as motana is retired and brady is 29.Let brady finish his career and then it will be time to compare.

patriotspride

ya it is isnt it .