View Poll Results: which is more important???

quality(difference makers and skill positions) 18 85.71%
quantity(depth) 3 14.29%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

Old 12-25-2004, 11:29 PM   #31 (permalink)
TheBenior
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 120
TheBenior is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by LoviesBears@Dec 24 2004, 10:39 PM
Screw the Bears message board. For some reason, me and a few other posters( I found out on another Bears site) are suspended for some reason or another. Me and Mrkodi are suspended until July 10, 2005, and PeanutTillman is suspended until June 10, 2005. Another poster said that he was suspended until Oct. of 2005. I sent them an email complaining about their lack of moderation on the boards, and when I tried to get on later that night, it said that I was suspended. Then I think later that day, the boards went offline.
Seriously? That's so weak, that board is crying out for admins and mods that do anything besides post the occasional sticky. The signal-to-noise (decent posts vs nonsensical rambling, childish rants, etc) ratio is probably the worst I've seen on any board.

Boards were offline tonight, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were choosing sometime between christmas and the new year to do maintenance (though the logical time would be some time shortly after the super bowl).
TheBenior is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 12-26-2004, 08:47 PM   #32 (permalink)
natas
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think the offensive line looked great today.. I mean, compared to what they have done, they look decent. They actually didn't look bad last week either, but columbo especially was a noticeable improvement over mitchell. He handled Hall very well. That being said, if columbo plays well next week, does that still make LT a top priority? I think a playmaking receiver should be our #1.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2004, 09:44 PM   #33 (permalink)
sportsden13
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: huntington,IN
Posts: 8,010
sportsden13 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by natas@Dec 26 2004, 09:47 PM
I think the offensive line looked great today.. I mean, compared to what they have done, they look decent. They actually didn't look bad last week either, but columbo especially was a noticeable improvement over mitchell. He handled Hall very well. That being said, if columbo plays well next week, does that still make LT a top priority? I think a playmaking receiver should be our #1.
i still think LT should be a priority.columbo is only a servicable LT and already has had 1 MAJOR knee injury.how much faith can we really put in him.

i say we still draft a LT in rounds 1 or 2 and then use columbo in a rotation at both T positions.

i still think a WR in round 1 would be a mistake but i would support said player because he would be a bear.
__________________
sportsden13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2004, 09:30 AM   #34 (permalink)
Matt_Brophy
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 801
Matt_Brophy is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Happy New year....

Again, I'll provide a counter-point. We'll be drafting in the Top 10 this year, no doubt....so either trade down (to get who / what?) or select what dominate lineman? Frankly, I don't see a tackle that is head-and-shoulders above former classes in this area...otherwise, yeah, get a top notch tackle.

I look at the other offenses in the league that run Gilman's One Back offense and it looks like this;

Carolina
RB-S.Davis / D.Foster
TE-K.Mangum
WR-K.Colbert
WR-S.Smith
WR-M.Muhammad

Kansas City
RB-P.Holmes/ L.Johnson
TE-T.Gonzalez
WR-E.Kennison
WR-J.MOrton
WR-D.Hall

Washington
RB-C.Portis
TE-R.Royal
WR-R.Gardner
WR-L.Coles
WR-J.Thrash

St.Louis
RB-M.Faulk / S.Jackson
TE-B. Manumaleuna
WR-I.Bruce
WR-T.Holt
WR-K.Curtis

Pittsburgh
RB-J.Bettis / D.Staley
TE-J.Tuman
WR-H.Ward
WR-A.Randle El
WR-P.Burress

With the exception of their LEFT TACKLE, these offenses are pretty consistent in their personnel. High flying receivers, top notch runners, and non-descript linemen.

Quote:
SUMMARY OF THE PRINCIPLES SID GILLMAN LIVED BY:
1. Spread the field horizontally and vertically with all 5 receivers; 2. Pass to set up the run (NOT the other way around); 3. One-Back formations are a MUST!
He believed that a strong running game is what you shoot for, but the likelihood of garnering a "Big Play" from the pass was considerably more likely than from a "big Run"....

Our WR corps is made up of a 3rd rounder and two 5th rounders....that is total crap!
Matt_Brophy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2004, 01:52 PM   #35 (permalink)
sportsden13
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: huntington,IN
Posts: 8,010
sportsden13 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Matt_Brophy@Dec 27 2004, 10:30 AM
Happy New year....

Again, I'll provide a counter-point. We'll be drafting in the Top 10 this year, no doubt....so either trade down (to get who / what?) or select what dominate lineman? Frankly, I don't see a tackle that is head-and-shoulders above former classes in this area...otherwise, yeah, get a top notch tackle.

I look at the other offenses in the league that run Gilman's One Back offense and it looks like this;

Carolina
RB-S.Davis / D.Foster
TE-K.Mangum
WR-K.Colbert
WR-S.Smith
WR-M.Muhammad

Kansas City
RB-P.Holmes/ L.Johnson
TE-T.Gonzalez
WR-E.Kennison
WR-J.MOrton
WR-D.Hall

Washington
RB-C.Portis
TE-R.Royal
WR-R.Gardner
WR-L.Coles
WR-J.Thrash

St.Louis
RB-M.Faulk / S.Jackson
TE-B. Manumaleuna
WR-I.Bruce
WR-T.Holt
WR-K.Curtis

Pittsburgh
RB-J.Bettis / D.Staley
TE-J.Tuman
WR-H.Ward
WR-A.Randle El
WR-P.Burress

With the exception of their LEFT TACKLE, these offenses are pretty consistent in their personnel. High flying receivers, top notch runners, and non-descript linemen.



He believed that a strong running game is what you shoot for, but the likelihood of garnering a "Big Play" from the pass was considerably more likely than from a "big Run"....

Our WR corps is made up of a 3rd rounder and two 5th rounders....that is total crap!
there arent really any gallery type tackles out there this year.ferguson was really the only thing close and that was based on potential.

im not sold on williams in this offense either.so IMHO i think angelo will trade down and try to solidfy maybe 4 spots on day one rather than 2 (since we dont have a 3rd round pick).

__________________
sportsden13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios