Originally posted by dolphins@Jan 8th '06 @ 8:27 am those are my
Those Wisconsin WRs are studs, but they don't have a QB capcable of getting them the ball regularly and consistently. Definately good for low 5 spots.
Also O'Callaghan is a beast and a great mauler but a decent athlete for that size. Without Jrs he's definately worthy of a mid to late first round pick without the injury and offseason concerns of Justice or Winston. Obviously less talented but less risk.
Spitz is incredibly underrated. I assumed everyone had him as a top 3-5 OG even if #1 is a little high. Outside of Luitui noone has impressed me a lot TBH. Gilles is a bit overrated and with the OU injury problems I could see why Joseph would fall too.
Originally posted by TitanFan@Jan 8th '06 @ 3:13 pm Those Wisconsin WRs are studs, but they don't have a QB capcable of getting them the ball regularly and consistently. Definately good for low 5 spots.
Also O'Callaghan is a beast and a great mauler but a decent athlete for that size. Without Jrs he's definately worthy of a mid to late first round pick without the injury and offseason concerns of Justice or Winston. Obviously less talented but less risk.
Spitz is incredibly underrated. I assumed everyone had him as a top 3-5 OG even if #1 is a little high. Outside of Luitui noone has impressed me a lot TBH. Gilles is a bit overrated and with the OU injury problems I could see why Joseph would fall too.
Remember this is a ranking not who goes where
okay, okay
Wisconisn WRs- where he's got them is in the 2nd range which is way too high
O'Callaghan is good but not that good, I could see him in the 2nd round, but not top 20s
Yes on Spitz, but he is not the top OG
but still if you are going to go rankings, at least do a good job at it
Originally posted by UKCOLT@Jan 8th '06 @ 3:25 pm I wish that they learnt to count to "5" Rather than 5, 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, 5e. If you are going to do that, just say top 10. Really does annoy me.