<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbo78912 @ Aug 5th ) [snapback]1650573[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
You're an LSU homer who doesn't even know your players...
[/b]
|
I know who every player is in the program and I have said a hundred times that I'm an Lsu homer. But there is something very odd about these rankings. How can you make a ranking of the top 20 QBs in the nation and leave out one of the top 5? He even went so far to put Ohio State's back-up QB in there. It is just weird. I know he's a scout and he devotes a ton of time to studying players. But what criteria is used to make this up? Pro potential? Let's break it down then... 1. size- Jamarcus is physically bigger than everybody else on the list (6'6, 255).. 2. skill- Jamarcus has a quick release and the strongest arm in college football, bar none... 3. production- Jamarcus was 10-2 as a starter and had a passer effiency of 130... 4. level of play- He plays for a top 10 program in the toughest conference in football... About the only knock on him, is that he is has some injury problems and some don't think he's mobile enough (which is odd cause a dozen division one basketball programs offered him scholarships as well). To me, Jamarcus is the next coming of Carson Palmer or Drew Bledsoe (I didn't say Bryon Leftwich cause I wanted to stay away from the race thing). So how are back-ups and WAC QBs getting higher ratings?
I love stirring the pot....