Reply

Old 01-03-2007, 09:58 PM   #41 (permalink)
THRILLHO
FBF Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 167
THRILLHO is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I really, really hope that the Raiders (my most hated team) don't take my boy Jamarcus.
__________________
THRILLHO is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 01-03-2007, 10:53 PM   #42 (permalink)
imported_King Gator7
FBF All Star Running Back!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 768
imported_King Gator7 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(r8erray @ Jan 3rd ) [snapback]1845118[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
I really hope we trade down a few spots to set ourselves up for a great draft this year & next year we got a lot of holes to fill and we're gonna need extra picks. I'm hoping we can get either a Peterson/Smith...Lynch/Smtih...Johnson/Smith combo in the first two rounds so we can really start building something on offense
[/b]


Another year of Brooks/Walter??????
__________________


University of Champions
imported_King Gator7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2007, 10:54 PM   #43 (permalink)
imported_King Gator7
FBF All Star Running Back!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 768
imported_King Gator7 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Better get one of those 2....Quinn, Russell, in that order
__________________


University of Champions
imported_King Gator7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2007, 11:01 PM   #44 (permalink)
Nixon
FBF Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sink Florida, Sink.
Posts: 32,651
Nixon is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ejruiz @ Jan 2nd ) [snapback]1843883[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
I think that the Raiders will draft Calvin Johnson at #1 overall

[/b]
oh noez, EJ agrees with me.
__________________
CUNT SAUCE!!!
Nixon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 03:10 AM   #45 (permalink)
BoltzRule
FBF Hall Of Famer
 
BoltzRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 12,574
BoltzRule is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Ok I'm sure that Millen and the Lions have learned their lesson, but what are the odds that the Lions pick Calvin Johnson #2?
__________________
BoltzRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 05:22 PM   #46 (permalink)
igman1832
FBF Coach
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Grand Blanc
Posts: 3,275
igman1832 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

slim and none.
igman1832 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 07:56 PM   #47 (permalink)
marny_navis
Looking to be drafted
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 58
marny_navis is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Prolly Russell #1 or CJ. Since their's no WR's at the end of the 1st round that the Raiders could trade up to get, they would most likely take Johnson, then send Moss for a second rounder or Porter for a late second or early third, and package either with their own second rounder for a late-mid or late first rounder. They'd probably have to add more if they do the Porter trade. If they are content with the guys they have right now, then they can go with Russell, but in my opinion they need to find a suitor for Porter for a 3rd, trade Moss for a second, and package their own along with those two picks for a comfortable mid 1st rounder in which they could almost assuredly get Smith. Maybe the Pats would do it, in which case maybe a 4th rounder would be better 2 give them instead of the 3rd. The Pats would still have a late pick, and they could build more at the corner and safety positions, and get the next young players to lead the franchise. Here is my Raiders and Lions 1st round summed up right now:

Raiders #1: Calvin Johnson
Raiders Mid-1st rounder: Troy Smith

Lions #2: Brady Quinn

I don't like Quinn that much, b/c he never does that well in big games, and he's still never won a game against a team finishing in the top 25 at the end of the season, unless somethin happens 2 georgia tech. i haven't been watching them closely, but even that game they didn't earn the win. If Brian Brohm were to enter, he would be the undoubted pick by me for the Lions, but he isn't i heard somewhere. Thomas would be a great pick, and so would gaines adams if they were to trade down a little. The offensive line sucks reall bad tho so they'll proly go there.

marny_navis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 12:42 AM   #48 (permalink)
imported_Lsuredskinman
FBF QB
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 350
imported_Lsuredskinman is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I'm sure whoever the Raiders select as head coach (since Shell got fired today) will make it his first priority to smooth out the situation between the club and Moss/Porter. He would have to know and stress to both receivers that the club can't get market value for them, so they won't be traded. That would give Oakland that scary 3some they should have had last year, which means they shouldn't need a WR early in the draft. Oakland has to go QB. I just don't see a way around it. They have young O-linemen and can't afford to bust with another one (especially at the first pick). I'm also of the opinion that you never take a RB too early, plus I just don't see any RB worthy of a top 5 yet.
imported_Lsuredskinman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 02:23 AM   #49 (permalink)
PackSACK92
FBF Pro Bowler
 
PackSACK92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Whitewater, WI
Posts: 1,247
PackSACK92 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(O @ Jan 1st ) [snapback]1841200[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
16. This will be a good judge of Ted Thompson in a tricky draft spot.
[/b]




I really think we need a RB or TE here, UNLESS a player with fantastic ability somehow falls this far and we take him just because he's too good to pass up. IDK if there's really any good TE's in this draft though?? Or maybe will pick one up in FA. I'm thinkin it's gonna either be Lynch or we trade down for more picks... a couple more 2 rounders would be nice!
__________________
Green Bay Packers World Champions
1929, 1930, 1931, 1936, 1939, 1944, 1961, 1962, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1996



PackSACK92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios