BroadStBullies

Eagles should get a B. We get two 1st rounds next year and a 2nd and 4th this year all for that 19th pick, that's one hell of a trade.

__________________

beardown1

I bump the Bucs up to a B I think Talib is going to be a tough corner in the league and they badly needed secondary help.

Reg

I initially gave my Cowboys a B minus (just on potential cuz NO ONE knows how rooks will turn out, so you can't truly assess a draft for 2-3 years). However, if Scandrick (CB) can play half as well with the big boys as he just did in mini-camp and Bennett (TE) can do something besides talk basketball and swear he has super-powers, I may give Da Boys and A plus on this draft. That of course, depends on Jones, Choice and Jenkins proving to be the real deals.

__________________

Professor

Mr. Clean, I appreciate the nice grade for the EAGLES, but Trevor Laws does not play Oline, therefore will not work with Runyan or Thomas, lol

Also, no comment on Jack Ikegwuono, hmmm

__________________

Professor

and no Raiders, I thought you would immediately become part of the raider nation

__________________

gruntbygod

Ive seen to much *****ing about "No WR?????" People need to realize that this was a very weak WR class, and next years will be better than 2007. I would rather get a Heyward-Bay, Crabtree or Harvin next year than a Malcolm Kelly, Donnie Avery, or Mario Manningham this year

__________________

Sinyen

Wow, seems like a lot of Cowboy fans on here. That's awesome, being one myself. I think I agree with A- grade. It's so hard to say with rookies how they will pan out, but Dallas did what they needed to do, drafted for need and got a few quality guys with potential to play. They didn't need depth for most part, so why draft 10 guys that likely won't make the team? I'm gonna be mighty P.O.'d though if Mendenhall turns out to be the next LT.....

MrClean

I really didn't agree with that pick for them and was disappointed at first that DMac ended up at Oakland, but it's starting to grow on me somewhat. There's no doubt that McFadden has the talent, character, and work ethic to be a franchise runningback for any NFL team. Al Davis is a sucker for offensive super-athletes, and DMac is definitely a rare breed. Just in terms of the immediate future, I think there could have been a much more pressing need addressed, but McFadden should have an early impact for an already struggling team.

__________________

M-247gunner

Behind a mediocre at best OL and what will most likely be a "Running Back by committee" offense wont bode well for Mcfadden IMO.

__________________


http://www.myspace.com/cadillacman64

MrClean

That's why I'd only consider it a good long-term pick. It would've been in the best immediate interest of the team to bring in a franchise offensive tackle with the 4th pick of the 1st Round, allowing them to bring in a top quality runningback with an added anchor on the offensive line. Yes, I can understand why Al Davis didn't want to pass up on a player like Darren McFadden being as his next picks were the 1st and 26th of the 4th Round. But you don't start rebuilding a football team with the skill positions. You've got to have an offensive line that can block for your 1st round quarterback or 1st round runningback, or else having either one of those extremely talented players would be pointless.

__________________