Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RoyWilliams
Turtle around, you ignore every post i put about stats. One poster agreed with you that he is bottom 6, thats it. Others said he was average. Your first statement was he is bottom 5, and the cheeseheads are pissed he is back, since then you have backtracked into trying to get me to name 15 after i named six like you originally said. And i already said that you were completely wrong by saying they are all pissed he is back bc on Packers boards they were all excited and happy hes comin back. But continue on trying to be the TO of the board, but just like him your act is old.
|
six?...maybe 3
I will give you that Johnson is worse...I will own up and say that I would rather have Favre than Johnson...I knew he was bad but not that bad...isn't he a back up anywy?...doesn't count
Carr...nope, I'll take Carr next year over Favre
Garrard...I would rather have Garrad next year as well, he could prove to be decent...
Grossman...hell after tonight maybe you do have an arguement there, but if i had to choose between Favre and Grossman next year...i think i would still take Grossman, but that is a tough one.
Harrington...hell, i don't know, i will give you that one
Frye...you win
so you have given me 5 decent arguements...3 of which i don't agree with, but i will give them to you.
Carr
Garrad
Frye
Harrington
Grossman
GOT 5 MORE????
probably not because you would look dumb
Favre is above average right?...should be easy enough for you...or you could just continue to talk about how i ignore you and no one agrees with me on this...or you could bring up some of my past again and how i am T.O....either way...YOU LOSE THIS ONE...