 |
|
03-06-2006, 10:19 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 28,057
|
NFL | Agreement in principal reached; owners have to agree now
Mon, 6 Mar 2006 07:08:26 -0800
ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports an agreement in principal has been reached in the NFL's labor talks, but now that agreement has to be agreed to by the NFL owners. The biggest hurdle to the agreement will be revenue sharing. As noted previously, the agreement will be presented at an owner's meeting in Dallas Tuesday, March 7.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
03-06-2006, 10:40 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Gravel Pit
Posts: 5,141
|
__________________
"Hallo, meine dispatcher says there is something wrong mit deine Kabel?"
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-2006, 10:41 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Future
Posts: 1,525
|
I should probably be happy about this.
Should be.
But now the owners have to get together...
****
__________________
------------------
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-2006, 10:53 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cincy
Posts: 1,219
|
Quote:
Originally posted by NX84@Mar 6th '06 @ 9:41 am
I should probably be happy about this.
Should be.
But now the owners have to get together...
****
|
Exactly, that's probably the bigger issue anyway.
__________________
"I need for some things to start happening."
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-2006, 11:27 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Future
Posts: 1,525
|
Well... i hear it takes 9 owners to shoot something down like this.
Hopefully, it gets done.
__________________
------------------
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-2006, 11:30 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
|
Lets hope this happens. Its good for the NFL, it's product on the field, and its fans.
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-2006, 11:30 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Pro Bowler
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,346
|
Im concerned about the revnue sharing for small market teams in the future. No point having a cap if half the teams cant spend it. But hopefuly they can work on that some more in the future. We need to get this CBA done 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-2006, 11:35 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 43,214
|
Quote:
Originally posted by IckeyWoods@Mar 6th '06 @ 11:30 am
Im concerned about the revnue sharing for small market teams in the future. No point having a cap if half the teams cant spend it. But hopefuly they can work on that some more in the future. We need to get this CBA done
|
if i'm not mistaken, the cap level is concordant with shared revenue. the cap is never above anyone's spending limitations.
__________________
AIM: grandoompahpah
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-2006, 11:36 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Pro Bowler
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,346
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Legobedan@Mar 6th '06 @ 10:35 am
if i'm not mistaken, the cap level is concordant with shared revenue. the cap is never above anyone's spending limitations.
|
thats what i thought, but ive been reading a load of articles recently saying that with the new CBA that this is not the case because of the revnue sharing not being increased. I could be wrong, soo many article banging around regarding this kind of stuff it does get confusing.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-2006, 11:44 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 43,214
|
what do you mean "increased"? the only difference between old revenue sharing and the proposed revenue sharing is the sharing of revenue from memorabilia and the like, that a team raises on its own.
__________________
AIM: grandoompahpah
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
NFL | Agreement in principal reached
