 |
|
05-06-2008, 12:08 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
|
619
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 863 Florida
Posts: 5,690
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Footbalmaster
It was in reference to proffessor saying what he thought the punishment should be. The punishment will be based on what Walsh has for info. If he has everything he says he has then I'm expecting a year suspension and Pete Carrol automatically put as head coach.
|
and while your at it the Pats can cut Brady and sign Ryan Leaf, Robert Craft sells the Pats to the Raiders, and move the Pats from New England to Mexico City...
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
05-06-2008, 03:08 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 7,123
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-Rez25
and while your at it the Pats can cut Brady and sign Ryan Leaf, Robert Craft sells the Pats to the Raiders, and move the Pats from New England to Mexico City...
|
=
Greatest team of all time.
__________________
Beast!!
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 07:48 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
FBF All Star Running Back!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 559
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-Rez25
and while your at it the Pats can cut Brady and sign Ryan Leaf, Robert Craft sells the Pats to the Raiders, and move the Pats from New England to Mexico City...
|
thats not a bad idea. got any more?
__________________
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 11:06 AM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Footbalmaster
Comparing this to Pacman Jones is a joke. First of all Pacman to me is the prime suspect in killing someone. I don't finding cheating and murder on the same page. Second its obvious that if theres new info then they'll get punished again. That was stated back when it all started. The question is what will it be and I believe lying definitely deserves a suspension. As much as it pains me to say it its the only fair and logical next step.
|
Pacman was charged with a crime, Pats spied on other teams.. Both are violations of NFL rules. As far as the NFL is concerned it can only punish people for violating their rules. Pacman has yet to be convicted by our legal system which means he's innocent until proven guilty last I checked. The Pats, on the other hand, destroyed evidence to prevent a full investigation by the league but was still found guilty. The nature of their violation of league rules should be taken into consideration to an extent but shouldn't the Pats be made an example of just like Pacman was for players? Thats how I think Goodell has to look at it if he's not going to draw a line in the sand with the NFLPA. The League is already constantly battling retired players who are unhappy on various issues they don't need to start upsetting current players with double standards.
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 04:52 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Pro Bowler
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,257
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevemc
Pacman was charged with a crime, Pats spied on other teams.. Both are violations of NFL rules. As far as the NFL is concerned it can only punish people for violating their rules. Pacman has yet to be convicted by our legal system which means he's innocent until proven guilty last I checked. The Pats, on the other hand, destroyed evidence to prevent a full investigation by the league but was still found guilty. The nature of their violation of league rules should be taken into consideration to an extent but shouldn't the Pats be made an example of just like Pacman was for players? Thats how I think Goodell has to look at it if he's not going to draw a line in the sand with the NFLPA. The League is already constantly battling retired players who are unhappy on various issues they don't need to start upsetting current players with double standards.
|
Well obviously some people have a hard time reading and understanding facts. But I don't disagree that if they cheated again they should be punished. Second I said I felt Pacman was guilty. I never said he was convicted and I have every right to believe what I want. Do you believe OJ is guilty, or what about Roger Clemens? Next I would love to hear some facts saying the Patriots purposely destroyed information, because last I heard Goodell was the only person who had done that. And what do retired football players have to do with anything. If you want to talk about them create another thread.
__________________
The Patriots dynasty is the best ever in Football history.
|
|
|
05-08-2008, 02:46 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Footbalmaster
Well obviously some people have a hard time reading and understanding facts. But I don't disagree that if they cheated again they should be punished. Second I said I felt Pacman was guilty. I never said he was convicted and I have every right to believe what I want. Do you believe OJ is guilty, or what about Roger Clemens? Next I would love to hear some facts saying the Patriots purposely destroyed information, because last I heard Goodell was the only person who had done that. And what do retired football players have to do with anything. If you want to talk about them create another thread.
|
If you assume Pacman is guilty its the same as me assuming the Pats did the same thing anyone else would do with evidence of their own wrong doing... destroy it before its used against you.
Btw, when talking about the pats Retired players always have something to do with it since its the senior citizen bandwagon team where players grow old hoping to tag along for a last chance at a super bowl ring. Anyway, I was getting at the fact Goodell doesn't seem to care as much for the players as he does making the league money. By going easy on the Pats it didn't take away anything from them. A 1st rounder is bad to loose but the punishment came after the fact the Pats already had an additional 1st rounder. My Point is the Pats got a slap on the wrist when they should of been the example of. I know its rough to think everyone's new favorite team over the past couple years isn't as clean and whole sum as everyone thought. It's just so much easier to go after a guy like Pacman or Henry who have no sense and don't think about what they are doing and punish them for it VS punishing the team the league was playing up with their great attitude of take less money and play as a team. This whole situation casts a dark cloud over the NFL's latest Dynasty... Can we even call them that now that theres accusations they've cheated?
|
|
|
05-08-2008, 02:54 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
|
Both of them
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,225
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Footbalmaster
Comparing this to Pacman Jones is a joke. First of all Pacman to me is the prime suspect in killing someone. I don't finding cheating and murder on the same page. Second its obvious that if theres new info then they'll get punished again. That was stated back when it all started. The question is what will it be and I believe lying definitely deserves a suspension. As much as it pains me to say it its the only fair and logical next step.
|
I must have missed this, please do tell.
__________________
|
|
|
05-08-2008, 02:57 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 7,123
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevemc
If you assume Pacman is guilty its the same as me assuming the Pats did the same thing anyone else would do with evidence of their own wrong doing... destroy it before its used against you.
Btw, when talking about the pats Retired players always have something to do with it since its the senior citizen bandwagon team where players grow old hoping to tag along for a last chance at a super bowl ring. Anyway, I was getting at the fact Goodell doesn't seem to care as much for the players as he does making the league money. By going easy on the Pats it didn't take away anything from them. A 1st rounder is bad to loose but the punishment came after the fact the Pats already had an additional 1st rounder. My Point is the Pats got a slap on the wrist when they should of been the example of. I know its rough to think everyone's new favorite team over the past couple years isn't as clean and whole sum as everyone thought. It's just so much easier to go after a guy like Pacman or Henry who have no sense and don't think about what they are doing and punish them for it VS punishing the team the league was playing up with their great attitude of take less money and play as a team. This whole situation casts a dark cloud over the NFL's latest Dynasty... Can we even call them that now that theres accusations they've cheated?
|
Your blowing what the pats did way out of proportion. They did something that everyone does, and really, you crusade against them is a little stupid because of that.
__________________
Beast!!
|
|
|
05-08-2008, 03:21 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The-Hammer
Your blowing what the pats did way out of proportion. They did something that everyone does, and really, you crusade against them is a little stupid because of that.
|
I'm blowing it out of proportion because thats what the league should of done. Just like everyone blows every little legal trouble a player out of proportion. Make an example out of them just like they did with Pacman. Plain and simple. I understand if the Tuck Rule and other special treatment has spoiled Pats fans but looks like it has finally caught up every football noob's favorite team.
You say every team does it but only one team was caught. Its not a crusade against the Patriots by any means, its a crusade for the fair punishment anywhere and everywhere. Don't crucify individual players for things technically none of the NFL's business, depending which state's labor laws you reference, then turn around and cave in when its something that is actually league related.
|
|
|
05-08-2008, 03:27 PM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
|
FBF Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 7,123
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevemc
I'm blowing it out of proportion because thats what the league should of done. Just like everyone blows every little legal trouble a player out of proportion. Make an example out of them just like they did with Pacman. Plain and simple. I understand if the Tuck Rule and other special treatment has spoiled Pats fans but looks like it has finally caught up every football noob's favorite team.
You say every team does it but only one team was caught. Its not a crusade against the Patriots by any means, its a crusade for the fair punishment anywhere and everywhere. Don't crucify individual players for things technically none of the NFL's business, depending which state's labor laws you reference, then turn around and cave in when its something that is actually league related.
|
It's one thing to break the law, it's wuite another to break a rule in a sport. Do you honestly think, if the pats were the only team to do this, they would have a guy taping 5 FEET AWAY FROM MANGINI? I don't think so. Belichick isn't retarded.
It looks like a crusade, you can't compare breaking a rule to a crime. You crucify a player who acts like a thug because this league is not for thugs too play in.
__________________
Beast!!
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|