Thread Tools

Display Modes

**M-247gunner** · 05-20-2006, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vikingsfan2006

The vikings will finish with a better record than the eagles so if anyone wants to make a wager than step up and bet me

Yeah we should make these "dog" bets a sticky so they dont forget. put me down for 1,000 points spanky.

ZeeKnowsBest101 · 05-20-2006, 06:32 PM

I have to go with M-247 gunner on this one. The Vikings lost their star WR and their QB Daunte Culpepper. That was a bad move. Their franchise is going down the drain. FLUSH. They think they can make up for it by pick up Brad Johnson. Who's he gonna throw it to Carter and Hoaq. Who are they anyways. I know it was a bad move by the eagles to not stay with TO but still they got Westbrook, McNabb, ReggieBrown, and Jason Avant (I love that guy). And their defense is outstanding. They had like 10 plyrs on defense go to Hawaii last yr. Sorry Josh but they suck.

**stormdriver** · 05-20-2006, 07:29 PM

Let's see. One of the projected top two teams in the NFC's best division against one of the projected bottom two teams in the entire NFL's worst division. Who should we bet on??

chris_36824 · 05-20-2006, 08:05 PM

ill take the Eagles to have a better record than the Vikings .. even though i cant bet on this one i still agree that they will have a better season this year..

**MickeyG** · 05-20-2006, 09:40 PM

My moneys on the Vikings

**M-247gunner** · 05-20-2006, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stormdriver

Let's see. One of the projected top two teams in the NFC's best division against one of the projected bottom two teams in the entire NFL's worst division. Who should we bet on??

IMO the NFC-west is a bit worse {top to bottom** than the NFC-north.

J-Unit · 05-20-2006, 11:49 PM

If you asked me ten times... I would say the eagles every time.

chris_36824 · 05-21-2006, 12:36 AM

i think the teams in the NFC West are better than the teams in the NFC North.. Cards, Rams, and Seahawks all have potential starpower.. unlike most of the teams in the NFC North..

Mad Viking · 05-21-2006, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MickeyG

My moneys on the Vikings

MickeyG... you know I like ya, respect ya and acknowledge that your taste in teams is impeccable (

), but I don't think the Vikes have anything on the Eagles right now. No Culpepper, no Moss, no Burleson ... no appreciable talent. Plus, their draft choices (Greenway, Griffin, Jackson, Blue, Edwards and Cook) are probably not going to be able to make an immediate positive impact to the team.

I stand by my earlier post on another thread that they can outperform the Packers (betting all my points on it), but not the Eagles. Maybe in a future season, but not this one.

**Professor** · 05-21-2006, 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manster

Yes but that one year is the year they made it to the SB. Before that they were playing in the weakest divison in the NFL. This year their short coming at WR will hurt them more than it did back then. You can not keep saying because this work out OK three years ago that it will again, you must take into account for what other teams are doing.

yeah, but they made it to the suberbowl without TO in the entire postseason

that year
record in the playoffs with TO
0-1
without TO
2-0

they can play fine without TO.

Thread Tools Display Modes

View more football photos

Thread Tools

Display Modes