Hell, maybe if you find a good running back, you can just move Westbrook to WR and he can be your #1 reciever
Not a bad call actually.
I think the Westy/Moats combo could be a great one. Even out their touches so neither one is overworked. Again, we could probably use a bruiser but it's not a necessity.
Originally posted by krzyroone@Feb 7th '06 @ 12:48 pm Not a bad call actually.
I think the Westy/Moats combo could be a great one. Even out their touches so neither one is overworked. Again, we could probably use a bruiser but it's not a necessity.
Originally posted by bigsexyy81@Feb 7th '06 @ 2:38 pm You must have never heard of Lamar Gordon!!!
Andy Reid doesnt seem to like Lamar Gordon. That and he has a problem staying on the field it seems.
__________________
When Sean Avery was a child, he made his mother finish his vegetables.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Brooklyn @ May 20th ) [snapback]2006104[/snapback]</div>
Originally posted by GoGiants98@Feb 7th '06 @ 3:45 pm I think the Eagles are in a unique position this off-season. I can't really pick one position that they're in DESPERATE need to improve at compared to the other positions that they need upgraded. A #1 WR is a must, but their offense would be fine without one. Brown, Pinkston, Lewis, Smith, McNabb, Westbrook, they'd be ok.
OLB would be huge for them, but again, theyve got some average players that they could make it by with. They had an amazing defense the superbowl year, especially down the stretch, and it was with these guys at OLB.
At DE, there's not much you can do about Kearse, I doubt he'd get cut. Spend a late round draft pick on an athletic DE that you can rotate in, similiar to the Giants Justin Tuck. A versitale guy that can play both end positions.
DT, same thing here, Peterson and Thomas arent necessarily bad, and arent necessarily guys that dont belong in an NFL starting lineup, but a huge run stuffer and a guy that demands double teams would do a lot for the Eagles defense.
A running back that's good enough to get 10 or so touches a game would do wonders for Westbrook, Westbrook's gotten hurt with limited carries the past two seasons, so the last thing he needs is to carry the load. It would also do wonders for how they could use him in the passing game. Hell, maybe if you find a good running back, you can just move Westbrook to WR and he can be your #1 reciever
Very well said GG98
__________________
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(PeanutTillman)</div>
Quote:
"Vince.. Vince.. no.. goddamnit you dont eat your steak with a spoon."
Originally posted by GoGiants98@Feb 7th '06 @ 5:10 pm Andy Reid doesnt seem to like Lamar Gordon. That and he has a problem staying on the field it seems.
Maybe Andy doesn't like Gordon because he sucks
__________________
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(PeanutTillman)</div>
Quote:
"Vince.. Vince.. no.. goddamnit you dont eat your steak with a spoon."
Originally posted by Moe@Feb 7th '06 @ 3:14 pm Maybe Andy doesn't like Gordon because he sucks
Gordon looked impressive in St. Louis...and that was in a Mike Martz offense, how often do between the tackle type runners shine in Martz's system?
__________________
When Sean Avery was a child, he made his mother finish his vegetables.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Brooklyn @ May 20th ) [snapback]2006104[/snapback]</div>
Originally posted by GoGiants98@Feb 7th '06 @ 5:17 pm Gordon looked impressive in St. Louis...and that was in a Mike Martz offense, how often do between the tackle type runners shine in Martz's system?
Good point
__________________
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(PeanutTillman)</div>
Quote:
"Vince.. Vince.. no.. goddamnit you dont eat your steak with a spoon."
Eagles offseason
Not a bad call actually.
/07215_206.jpg ":drool:")
Linear Mode
