 |
|
04-05-2008, 01:39 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
|
FBF All Star Running Back!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 860
|
Right now I hope we can get Jackson, Hardy, or Thomas. But I really don't think we're gonna draft a WR in the first. And hopefully we can get a deal done for Sheppard.
__________________
Boo? F$%@ you. - Chase Utley
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
04-05-2008, 02:45 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
|
# 1 eagles fan
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: the poconos, Pennsylvania
Posts: 5,668
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadStBullies
Right now I hope we can get Jackson, Hardy, or Thomas. But I really don't think we're gonna draft a WR in the first. And hopefully we can get a deal done for Sheppard.
|
I dont see why we wouldent its one of our biggest gaps. Our defense imo is fine. We have a good QB and a RB on offense. We need a #1 receiver curtis is the closest thing we have to a #1. Curtis is a # 2 and brown avant and baskett are #3.
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 12:49 AM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
TGM Trillionaire
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philly boy in Cali
Posts: 33,801
|
I want Phillips, thats who I want, I wanted a S last year, but they all got picked before us. Gholston is a monster, one of those special players. I am about 99% that chris long is going #1. You figure that #1 is about 35 million locked down - there are only a few positions that you sink that much money into and I just don't think that Ryan is #1 overall material. Chris Long is almost a no brainer.
__________________
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 01:55 AM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
|
Momma McNabb
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Jeffy's house
Posts: 12,476
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor
I want Phillips, thats who I want, I wanted a S last year, but they all got picked before us. Gholston is a monster, one of those special players. I am about 99% that chris long is going #1. You figure that #1 is about 35 million locked down - there are only a few positions that you sink that much money into and I just don't think that Ryan is #1 overall material. Chris Long is almost a no brainer.
|
If the dolphins keep the pick, he will. But Parcells is most certainly gonna trade out. Its anyones guys after that
__________________
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 02:36 AM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
|
TGM Trillionaire
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philly boy in Cali
Posts: 33,801
|
i would agree that the Dolphins trade, but
A. teams are more skeptical to give up what it would take to have the #1 pick
B. Give up all that and still have to pay 35 million + to the guy you take
C. Who is out there worth trading up to the #1 slot and who would be willing to do anything?
I just don't see how he can move out of #1 without taking less than what is worth the #1.
__________________
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 02:03 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
|
Momma McNabb
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Jeffy's house
Posts: 12,476
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor
i would agree that the Dolphins trade, but
A. teams are more skeptical to give up what it would take to have the #1 pick
B. Give up all that and still have to pay 35 million + to the guy you take
C. Who is out there worth trading up to the #1 slot and who would be willing to do anything?
I just don't see how he can move out of #1 without taking less than what is worth the #1.
|
One thing you gotta remeber about Parcells tho is that he really values mid round picks
__________________
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 10:25 AM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 64,405
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ball in the baskett
I like the DE we already have i dont want gholsten. I rather have one of the top receivers in the draft. If we could get one the top guy at 19 we should stay put imo. It wouldent be a bad idea to keep litto on out team.
|
one of our issues is we've only had one good pass rusher and not enough push up the middle. gholston is a beast and would negate any non push from our dt's.
there is no way the eagles spend #19 on a wr. the few that they would consider would be gone so they would look at safety imo and there is no way in hell the eagles would trade up to get a wideout.
also, the eagles gain nothing by keeping sheppard at this point. the only option is to trade him.
__________________
representin' section 227 - r.i.p. section 736
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 11:57 AM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
|
TGM Trillionaire
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philly boy in Cali
Posts: 33,801
|
It really makes our nickel defense super strong to keep Lito. Hansen had a good end to the season, but Lito is better than him. I do agree that trading him is optimal because we could upgrade in areas of real need.
I also think Juqua Thomas applied great pressure from the end, & Bunkley and Patterson were getting better and better all season long.
__________________
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 12:08 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
|
Momma McNabb
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Jeffy's house
Posts: 12,476
|
Lito to me is the same player as Anthony Henry. Very good CB when he is %100, but gets hurt to much and doesnt play well hurt.
I think the Nickel is the best place for both. Limit there chances to get hurt, and they would be effective players more than not
__________________
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 01:18 PM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
|
# 1 eagles fan
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: the poconos, Pennsylvania
Posts: 5,668
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smeagle
one of our issues is we've only had one good pass rusher and not enough push up the middle. gholston is a beast and would negate any non push from our dt's.
there is no way the eagles spend #19 on a wr. the few that they would consider would be gone so they would look at safety imo and there is no way in hell the eagles would trade up to get a wideout.
also, the eagles gain nothing by keeping sheppard at this point. the only option is to trade him.
|
I dont know the draft class to well. Do you think there will be a wide receiver worth takeing in the 2nd round.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|