Reply

Old 02-10-2006, 10:30 PM   #51 (permalink)
jeter4982
TeamGuru: GiantsInsider
 
jeter4982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 255
Credits: 10.00
jeter4982 is on a distinguished road
Default

But do you think it would be beneficial to drop teams only to add more? In my opinion relocation makes a lot more sense, as that way you at least have a little bit of a core to build upon, opposed to absolutely nothing with an expansion team...
__________________
-Tom
jeter4982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 02-13-2006, 03:25 PM   #52 (permalink)
Manster
Team Gridiron Masters!
 
Manster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,478
Credits: 5,503.26
Blog Entries: 7
Manster is just really niceManster is just really niceManster is just really niceManster is just really niceManster is just really nice
Default

It is not the best way of going about it but I thought it could be a way to get rid of some of the owners that are only at it to make money and not about winning.
Manster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2006, 04:03 PM   #53 (permalink)
stormdriver
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Image Hosting by Picoodle.com
 
stormdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Slightly north of Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,819
Credits: 29,776.84
stormdriver is a glorious beacon of lightstormdriver is a glorious beacon of lightstormdriver is a glorious beacon of lightstormdriver is a glorious beacon of lightstormdriver is a glorious beacon of lightstormdriver is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manster
It is not the best way of going about it but I thought it could be a way to get rid of some of the owners that are only at it to make money and not about winning.
If you do that, Dallas will be the first team to go. Why would you want that?
__________________






Idaho Vandals Fan
Green Bay Packers Fan
stormdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 11:10 AM   #54 (permalink)
Manster
Team Gridiron Masters!
 
Manster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,478
Credits: 5,503.26
Blog Entries: 7
Manster is just really niceManster is just really niceManster is just really niceManster is just really niceManster is just really nice
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stormdriver
If you do that, Dallas will be the first team to go. Why would you want that?
Jerry wants to win and will do what ever it takes to win. He thought he could make a winning team himself but found out he was wrong and paid big money to BP so that he could build a winner. Jerry has never had a problem with paying out big money to get what ever players he thought would help the team, execpt to LBs. The fact that he can make a lot of money also just adds to his ablity to sign players.

The teams I was talking about were ones like the Saints and the 49ers that dont seem to care what type of team they have unless it will help them get a new stadium.
Manster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 03:44 AM   #55 (permalink)
Jayhawk_Colin
The Screw Up
 
Jayhawk_Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,308
Credits: 3,028.59
Jayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to all
Default

As much as I hate Jerry Jones, I have to agree with Manster, Jones has never not been willing to shell out the big money.
Jayhawk_Colin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 03:51 AM   #56 (permalink)
Jayhawk_Colin
The Screw Up
 
Jayhawk_Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,308
Credits: 3,028.59
Jayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeter4982
But do you think it would be beneficial to drop teams only to add more? In my opinion relocation makes a lot more sense, as that way you at least have a little bit of a core to build upon, opposed to absolutely nothing with an expansion team...

Finacially, I don't think it would be good to drop teams, even in cities where the NFL teams suck, the NFL games bring in pretty good revenue.

On further expansion: I think the NFL really needs to be careful about overexpanding like the MLB did in the 90's (Colorado Rockies, Arizona D - back, Florida Marlins, Tampa Bay D - Rays). As I'm sure most of you know after their over expansion MLB was almost forced to contract the Twins or Expos (now the Nationals). I would really hate for the NFL to get into that sort of mess.
Jayhawk_Colin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 02:22 PM   #57 (permalink)
stormdriver
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Image Hosting by Picoodle.com
 
stormdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Slightly north of Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,819
Credits: 29,776.84
stormdriver is a glorious beacon of lightstormdriver is a glorious beacon of lightstormdriver is a glorious beacon of lightstormdriver is a glorious beacon of lightstormdriver is a glorious beacon of lightstormdriver is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayhawk_Colin
On further expansion: I think the NFL really needs to be careful about overexpanding like the MLB did in the 90's (Colorado Rockies, Arizona D - back, Florida Marlins, Tampa Bay D - Rays). As I'm sure most of you know after their over expansion MLB was almost forced to contract the Twins or Expos (now the Nationals). I would really hate for the NFL to get into that sort of mess.
I don't see that happening. I only suggested adding 8 teams because it would keep divisions even like they are now. Obviously though, you couldn't add them all the same year.
__________________






Idaho Vandals Fan
Green Bay Packers Fan
stormdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 02:58 PM   #58 (permalink)
Jayhawk_Colin
The Screw Up
 
Jayhawk_Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,308
Credits: 3,028.59
Jayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to all
Default

I think the NFL is perfect at 32 teams. Having 40 would just water down the talent in the NFL.
Jayhawk_Colin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 01:17 AM   #59 (permalink)
Jayhawk_Colin
The Screw Up
 
Jayhawk_Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,308
Credits: 3,028.59
Jayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeter4982
Plus, who would want to watch a NFL minor league team play?

An NFL minors could be put into towns like Portland, OR; Omaha, NB; Sacramento, CA; Richmond, VA; Witchita, KS; Columbus, OH; Louisville, KY; Montgomery, AL; Baton Rouge, LA; Santa Fe, NM; Honolulu, HW

Thats just 11 cities that arn't quite big enough for an NFL team they could be just perfect for a NFL minor leauge. I think you could get a huge following in these types of towns.
Jayhawk_Colin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 03:07 PM   #60 (permalink)
Jayhawk_Colin
The Screw Up
 
Jayhawk_Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,308
Credits: 3,028.59
Jayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to allJayhawk_Colin is a name known to all
Default

AFC
East: Baltimore Ravens, Miami Dolphins, New England Patriots, New York Jets

North: Buffalo Bills, Cincinatti Bengals, Cleveland Browns, Pittsburgh Steelers

Central: Denver Broncos, Indianapolis Colts, Kansas City Chiefs, Tennessee Titans

South: Birmingham Outlaws, Houston Texans, Jacksonville Jaguars, San Antonio Gunslingers

West: Los Angeles Knights, Oakland Raiders, Salt Lake Sidewinders, San Diego Chargers

NFC
East: New York Giants, Philadelphia Eagles, Virginia Beach Hammerheads, Washington Warriors

North: Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings

Central: Dallas Cowboys, Las Vegas Vultures, Omaha Tornadoes, St. Louis Rams

South: Atlanta Falcons, Carolina Panthers, New Orleans Saints, Tampa Bay Buccaneers

West: Arizona Cardinals, Portland Wolves, San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks

To avoid confusion, that's Birmingham, Alabama; Los Angeles, California; San Antonio, Texas; Omaha, Nebraska; Portland, Oregon; Salt Lake City, Utah; Las Vegas, Nevada; and Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Listen, the idea is ok, but you can't break up the AFC west, Chiefs Radiers Broncos and Chargers are all big rivals. Plus what if KC and OAK didn't get to play agianst one another. That would be like no X-mas
Jayhawk_Colin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios