P-Rez25

you better be thanking the football gods our best players were hurt cause if they werent, your old defense doesnt hold us to 3 FGs in the redzone, and your legacy of 18-1* wouldve just been 17-1*

__________________

Da Swami

"if"?

If my sister had balls then she would be my brother.

Nobody cares about "ifs".

P-Rez25

who the hell are you and why are you bringin up old threads?

__________________

Da Swami

What are you going to do about it?

Professor

prove you wrong and own you the whole way

__________________

Da Swami

I can see Im going to have lots of fun with you.

Theres always one.

Professor

thanks for playing Dr Defense, you are that one aren't you!!! guys like you have come and gone

Holy Diver
King something or other


you fall right in there with those guys. You have an opinion yet refuse to listen to anyone else and when you are proved wrong, you disappear. LOL

__________________

Da Swami

Show me where I was proven wrong.

P-Rez25

http://www.footballforum.com/oakland...outlook-3.html

post 27

__________________

Da Swami

Your proof consists of your opinion that isnt even backed with any fact.

The Raiders had a top 10 rushing attack yet youre still scratching your head as to why they had trouble translating that into a vertical passing attack.

You think a back will change that too.

Thats why I asked you a while back where you learned football.

Go back to what I wrote on the other thread about blitz angles dictating coverages. The problem was addressed already but you cant see it.

Youre embarrassing yourself dude.

Please stop....