 |
|
05-09-2006, 11:14 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
TeamGuru: Giant Flamehead
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Nashville,Tennessee
Posts: 3,721
|
Totally missed you there. I think Peter's career is just about down the tube.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
05-10-2006, 09:25 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Team Gridiron Masters!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: is right in front of the computer
Posts: 3,836
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by J-Unit
Totally missed you there. I think Peter's career is just about down the tube.
|
And I would second that motion, he is IMO the equivalent to Freddie Mitchell and will be gone soon. |
|
|
|
|
05-10-2006, 02:51 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
TGM Trillionaire
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philly boy in Cali
Posts: 33,858
|
freddie mitchell never returned kicks.
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2006, 03:02 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Slightly north of Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,819
|
Warrick may not be very good, but I would take almost any WR over that joke Engram. I don't honestly know why they keep him, he's lost two playoff games for them singlehandedly. When Engram starts dropping balls and/or Jackson gets hurt, look for Warrick to at least do something.
__________________
Idaho Vandals Fan
Green Bay Packers Fan
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2006, 03:34 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
TGM Trillionaire
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philly boy in Cali
Posts: 33,858
|
burleson will step in, in the event that one of those goes down, Also, do they still have that guy that played great last year and I think even started a couple of games with JJ. I forget his name, hackett or something.
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2006, 03:50 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Slightly north of Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,819
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by professorellisdtrails
burleson will step in, in the event that one of those goes down, Also, do they still have that guy that played great last year and I think even started a couple of games with JJ. I forget his name, hackett or something.
|
DJ Hackett yeah. I'd put him about the same, talent-wise as Warrick, but without the KR fumbles. Burleson as stated will be the #2 behind D-jax. Then Engram in the slot. I would prefer to see Engram on the bench, but hey. I'm only a Seattle fan when GB doesn't make the playoffs, so who cares what I think... 
__________________
Idaho Vandals Fan
Green Bay Packers Fan
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2006, 04:24 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
TeamGuru: Giant Flamehead
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Nashville,Tennessee
Posts: 3,721
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stormdriver
Warrick may not be very good, but I would take almost any WR over that joke Engram. I don't honestly know why they keep him, he's lost two playoff games for them singlehandedly. When Engram starts dropping balls and/or Jackson gets hurt, look for Warrick to at least do something.
|
Are you kiddind me? At least Engram is an experienced veteran. Warrick on the other hand has always had character issues. I don't see how you would take Warrick over Engram. |
|
|
|
|
05-10-2006, 05:28 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
FBF All Star Running Back!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Nashville
Posts: 613
|
ok i would like to put a word in but i dont want to be echoing wut anybody has said if thats ok with you stormdriver? anyways i dont see how anyone could say they wanted warrick over engram...warrick has yet to prove himself as a reliable WR...last year he had only bout 200 receiving yards in 13 games...also engram had around 800 yards in the same amount of games so i dont know who hes callin a joke...
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2006, 07:29 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Slightly north of Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,819
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by C-Unit33
warrick has yet to prove himself as a reliable WR...last year he had only bout 200 receiving yards in 13 games...also engram had around 800 yards in the same amount of games so i dont know who hes callin a joke...
|
You nailed it. He has yet to prove himself. No, he'll never be great, but he may be worthy of #3 at least. He doesn't get the ball enough to show if he can be decent or not. Engram, on the other hand, gets the ball all the time, and drops it 1/3rd of the time. I thought for sure he was gone after the 04 season when he dropped what would have been the winning TD in the endzone. I didn't say Warrick was good. I just said when you have a guy who hasn't shown what he's capable of, vs. a guy that fails under pressure year after year, you should at least give the first guy a try.
__________________
Idaho Vandals Fan
Green Bay Packers Fan
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2006, 09:02 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
FBF All Star Running Back!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Nashville
Posts: 613
|
i see where u are coming from now...i jus see warrick as an above average punt and kick retuner but thats jus me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Healthy WR Warrick Looks For Opportunity
