<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Althepostman @ Sep 29th ) [snapback]1725222[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
We're not bitter or anything here, are we? 
[/b]
|
Ever heard of a challenge, Hawk fan? Guess you want the easy way to get that cherished prize the way you raided the free agent market to buy your way. I know for a fact the early SUperbowls NEVER had teams buying their way in at all. Vince Lombardi should be disgusted the way you go about it in clinching it in only 4 games in an anemic division. NFC East and South is more enjoyable then the NFC WEst, who wants to play in either division? Even the North has Bears/VIkings contending, see, 2 teams that contend or 3 or even all 4 make it an enjoyable thing to watch. THe NFC west is depressing and ought to be abolished. And the scheduling format sucks, if you finish like 3rd, you get a 3rd place team in the outside division IE East, 3rd place IE South and all 4 contending teams per say in IE North. Well the NFL gave the 49ers the stupid Eagles rather then logical Deadskins because the Eagles sucked last year more then the Skins. THen the NFL gave us New Orleans but guess what? IT's AT, as in instant loss.
ANd don't even say my team is trying or not trying, it's a curse every single year in the NFC West and the same **** results. LEast other divisions have different teams finishing, but not the NFC West for the last 4 years or so, and I the 49er fan am sick of the anemic obvious results.
ANd it seems the NFL Gives you the crutch of the easy games and the difficult games on the 49ers, like get your *** kicked by the Eagles and wind up in KC for another beating, and then the Raiders can get win 1 or 2, and then San Diego can pound the ball on our weak defense. I say if teams can't contend, they should just forfeit the game and stop giving me the obvious ending.
That win over the Giants sucked also.