Originally posted by The Bitter Truth+May 4th '06 @ 12:57 pm--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (The Bitter Truth @ May 4th '06 @ 12:57 pm)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-CR1OwnsMe
Ross never said that Finneran was better than Ward
What you said was that you would rather have Finneran than Ward. I can't find the exact quote (too many 50 page threads show up in the search) but I can find people laughing at you
over it in about 20 different threads.
Other than that your post is the same old spin "down the middle" never pick a side sit on the fence girl talk. You are a *****. You can't even be man enough to pick a side of the debate. You just ride the fence and make vague statments because you aren't man enough to say it straight up.
You said that you would rather have Finneran than Ward. That isn't saying that Ward is better? Really? Double talking ***** without a decent honest bone in his body. What a joke. This is why we all laugh at you. Steve.
You're always wrong. You lie. You aren't man enough to admit it. You can't be straight with anything let alone your opinion. You are a complete joke. [/b][/quote]
You're really crumbling now, ****terMouth.
The first few lies didn't work so now you invent a new one. Even Flake was honest enough to show you for the fraud you are.
Of course you have nothing (no thread) to back your BS up so you resort to the recycling the same tired, empty, hyperbole "everyone's lauging at you" BS.
Let's try to get you back on track, ****ter. I'll even play your BS game, just for kicks.
If I said I wanted Ward instead of Terrel Owens, would that make Ward a better receiver than Owens? Abso****inglutely not.
Owens is the best WR in football, but I'd take Ward or Finneran over him anyday. There are a lot of factors (more than one, so that's why you're intellectually overwhelmed here) in choosing a player on a football team; scheme, work ethic, skills and chemistry just to name a few. The peabrained, neanderthal assumption that you always go with the best player, especially in light of the salary cap, is the level of thinking reserved for dope-addled, crack addicts, not real football fans.
Ward is a lunchpail guy who has benefitted tremendously froma strong work ethic and the fact that he's been able to line up across from junk like Dropsico and Try Edwards.
I don't have a big problem with replacing an older, more expensive, lunch-pail with a younger, cheaper, lunch-pail.
Ward had a good SB, and I'm glad for him. But he's still overpaid, and unless he can deliver the kind of PS performance we got from guys like Swann and Stall, I'm gonna stop short of thinking he can be replaced for less dough.
I know it's a real uphill climb for you to think on an adult level, but try. And if you can't try, at least try to try.
You were wise enough to slide away from your "he said we'll never win a SB with Roethlisberger" twist. Now sack up and move away from the Ward story.
And if you can't do that, please at least learn to spell and try to come up with something a little more sophisticated than the 3rd grade attack of "you're a *****, you're always wrong, you lie, etc.
Besides, don"t you think you ought to display some integrity (or at least look it up in the dictionary) before you start judging the integrity of others?
The gig's up ****ter. You've been owned